Paper · 2025 · Drying Technology

Impact of apple slice thickness and water-soaking pretreatment on catalytic infrared blanching efficiency and subsequent hot air drying performance

Bengang Wu; Yasmine Bouhile; Yiting Guo; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study examines the effects of water soaking pretreatment prior to catalytic infrared (CIR) blanching and hot air drying (HAD) on the drying characteristics, physicochemical properties, and quality attributes of dried apple slices. Apple slices were soaked in water before undergoing CIR blanching and HAD. The results indicated that water soaking significantly enhanced the efficiency of CIR blanching, resulting in faster polyphenol oxidase (PPO) inactivation, greater moisture loss, and better surface color retention compared to untreated samples. Microstructural analysis showed that the pretreatment caused more pronounced cellular disruption in the apple tissue, facilitating moisture removal during the drying process. The combined treatment of water soaking, CIR blanching, and HAD (CIR-HAD) substantially improved drying kinetics, reducing the drying time by 64 to 74% compared to HAD alone. Furthermore, CIR-HAD samples exhibited higher porosity, lower apparent density, and improved rehydration capacity. Thermal analysis revealed that CIR blanching promoted starch gelatinization at lower temperatures and enhanced starch retrogradation during rehydration, which contributed to improved textural properties in the rehydrated samples. Sensory evaluation indicated that CIR-HAD samples dried at 80 °C received the highest overall acceptability scores. These findings suggest that the integration of water soaking pretreatment, CIR blanching, and HAD represents a promising approach to enhance drying efficiency and improve the quality attributes of dried apple slices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking sped polyphenol oxidase inactivation.

Treatment
water soakinge0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO) inactivatione0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
untreated samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water soaking significantly enhanced the efficiency of CIR blanching, resulting in faster polyphenol oxidase (PPO) inactivation, greater moisture loss, and better surface color retention compared to untreated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking increased moisture loss.

Treatment
water soakinge0
Outcome
moisture losse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
untreated samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water soaking significantly enhanced the efficiency of CIR blanching, resulting in faster polyphenol oxidase (PPO) inactivation, greater moisture loss, and better surface color retention compared to untreated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking improved surface color retention.

Treatment
water soakinge0
Outcome
surface color retentione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
untreated samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water soaking significantly enhanced the efficiency of CIR blanching, resulting in faster polyphenol oxidase (PPO) inactivation, greater moisture loss, and better surface color retention compared to untreated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking caused more pronounced cellular disruption in apple tissue.

Treatment
pretreatmente0
Outcome
cellular disruptione0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pretreatment caused more pronounced cellular disruption in the apple tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined CIR-HAD reduced drying time by 64 to 74% versus HAD alone.

Treatment
combined treatment of water soaking, CIR blanching, and HAD (CIR-HAD)e0
Outcome
drying timee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
64 to 74%e0
Comparator
HAD alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment of water soaking, CIR blanching, and HAD (CIR-HAD) substantially improved drying kinetics, reducing the drying time by 64 to 74% compared to HAD alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIR-HAD produced higher porosity and lower apparent density.

Treatment
CIR-HADe0
Outcome
porositye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CIR-HAD samples exhibited higher porosity, lower apparent density, and improved rehydration capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIR-HAD samples had lower apparent density.

Treatment
CIR-HADe0
Outcome
apparent densitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CIR-HAD samples exhibited higher porosity, lower apparent density, and improved rehydration capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIR-HAD improved rehydration capacity.

Treatment
CIR-HADe0
Outcome
rehydration capacitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CIR-HAD samples exhibited higher porosity, lower apparent density, and improved rehydration capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIR blanching promoted starch gelatinization at lower temperatures.

Treatment
CIR blanchinge0
Outcome
starch gelatinizatione0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
lower temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CIR blanching promoted starch gelatinization at lower temperatures and enhanced starch retrogradation during rehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIR blanching enhanced starch retrogradation during rehydration.

Treatment
CIR blanchinge0
Outcome
starch retrogradatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CIR blanching promoted starch gelatinization at lower temperatures and enhanced starch retrogradation during rehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIR-HAD samples dried at 80 °C had highest acceptability.

Treatment
CIR-HADe0
Outcome
overall acceptability scorese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
80 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CIR-HAD samples dried at 80 °C received the highest overall acceptability scores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose integrating soaking, CIR blanching and HAD for dried apple quality and drying efficiency.

Outcome
integration of water soaking pretreatment, CIR blanching, and HADe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integration of water soaking pretreatment, CIR blanching, and HAD represents a promising approach to enhance drying efficiency and improve the quality attributes of dried apple slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1582 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

processing · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · soil: physics · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · soil: physics · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.