Paper · 2009 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Determination of the optimal pre-storage delayed cooling regime to control disorders and maintain quality in ‘Honeycrisp’TMapples

J. M. Delong; R. K. Prange; W. C. Schotsmans; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummarySeveral pre-storage time (0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 d) and temperature (3.5º, 10º, 15º, 20º, 25º, and 30ºC) delayed cooling (DC) treatments were tested on harvested ‘Honeycrisp’TM apples to determine which combination was optimal for reducing soft scald and low temperature breakdown (LTB), while maintaining the highest fruit quality [i.e., firmness, minimal mass loss, titratable acidity (TA), soluble solids content (SSC), absence of rot, and minimal skin greasiness] after 4 months of refrigerated air (RA) storage. Fruit were harvested from three separate Annapolis Valley (Nova Scotia) orchard sites in 2006 and in 2007. Multiple linear regression and surface response curves showed that fruit firmness and SSC generally increased throughout the DC treatment, but were affected curvilinearly by temperature, reaching a maximum at approx. 15ºC, then declining. Loss of fruit mass was positively related to a (day temperature2) interaction, indicating that it increased synergistically the longer and the warmer the DC treatment. Fruit acidity was affected only by temperature, with the highest TA values at approx. 15ºC, then declining at higher DC temperatures. Multiple logistic regression and surface responses demonstrated that the incidence of soft scald declined curvilinearly the longer and the warmer the DC treatment, while LTB declined curvilinearly with increasing DC temperature only. A positive (day2 temperature2) interaction indicated that fruit greasiness increased non-linearly as the duration and temperature of DC increased. Collectively, these results show that both soft scald and LTB were suppressed or eliminated by a DC regime of 25ºC for 1 – 2 d, or 30ºC for 1 d, without incurring a major reduction in fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple firmness generally increased during delayed cooling and peaked near 15ºC.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
DC treatmente0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approx. 15ºCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit firmness and SSC generally increased throughout the DC treatment, but were affected curvilinearly by temperature, reaching a maximum at approx. 15ºC, then declining”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–863 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple soluble solids generally increased during delayed cooling and peaked near 15ºC.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
DC treatmente0
Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approx. 15ºCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit firmness and SSC generally increased throughout the DC treatment, but were affected curvilinearly by temperature, reaching a maximum at approx. 15ºC, then declining”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–863 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit mass loss increased synergistically with delayed cooling duration and warmth.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
DC treatmente0
Outcome
Loss of fruit masse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
the longer and the warmere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“Loss of fruit mass was positively related to a (day temperature2) interaction, indicating that it increased synergistically the longer and the warmer the DC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1031 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple titratable acidity peaked around 15ºC and declined at higher cooling temperatures.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
Fruit aciditye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
approx. 15ºCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit acidity was affected only by temperature, with the highest TA values at approx. 15ºC, then declining at higher DC temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1165 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple soft scald incidence declined as delayed cooling became longer and warmer.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
DC treatmente0
Outcome
incidence of soft scalde0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
the longer and the warmere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“the incidence of soft scald declined curvilinearly the longer and the warmer the DC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1329 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple low temperature breakdown declined as delayed cooling temperature increased.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
increasing DC temperaturee0
Outcome
LTBe0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“LTB declined curvilinearly with increasing DC temperature only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1399 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit greasiness increased nonlinearly with delayed cooling duration and temperature.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
duration and temperature of DCe0
Outcome
fruit greasinesse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit greasiness increased non-linearly as the duration and temperature of DC increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling at 25ºC for 1 – 2 d suppressed or eliminated soft scald and low temperature breakdown without a major quality reduction.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
DC regime of 25ºC for 1 – 2 de0
Outcome
soft scald and LTBe0
Direction
suppressed or eliminatede0
Qualifier
without incurring a major reduction in fruit qualitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“both soft scald and LTB were suppressed or eliminated by a DC regime of 25ºC for 1 – 2 d, or 30ºC for 1 d, without incurring a major reduction in fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling at 30ºC for 1 d suppressed or eliminated soft scald and low temperature breakdown without a major quality reduction.

Material
‘Honeycrisp’TMt0
Treatment
30ºC for 1 de0
Outcome
soft scald and LTBe0
Direction
suppressed or eliminatede0
Qualifier
without incurring a major reduction in fruit qualitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“‘Honeycrisp’TMapples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“both soft scald and LTB were suppressed or eliminated by a DC regime of 25ºC for 1 – 2 d, or 30ºC for 1 d, without incurring a major reduction in fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1745 · show in text ↑

processing · soil: physics · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.