Paper · 2025 · Horticulturae

The Effects of Biostimulants on the Physiological Processes of Yield Formation and Resistance of Apples to Spring Frosts

Zoya Evgen’evna Ozherelieva; Pavel Sergeevich Prudnikov; Anna Yur’evna Stupina; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of new organo-mineral biostimulants in an apple orchard, including their relevance to spring frosts and to enhancing yield. The study evaluated the effects of foliar sprays with organo-mineral fertilizers on apple yield, comparing three treatments: 1—control (no treatment); 2—foliar spray with a 1% blend of “WPU” Antifreeze and 1% “WP Drip Ca + Mg”; 3—foliar application using a 3% solution of both “WPU” Antifreeze and “WP Drip Ca + Mg”. The NPC “White Pearl” foliar sprays exhibited cryoprotective properties to spring frosts through multiple mechanisms, i.e., prevention of cellular dehydration via elevated bound water content and accumulation of osmoprotective compounds including proline and soluble sugars. This research shows that the applied treatments improved carbohydrate metabolism by enhancing the biosynthesis of glucose and starch, as well as changing the donor–acceptor relationships between the leaf apparatus and the fruit toward the forming apple, promoting a better outflow of assimilates into ripening fruits. The 1% solution treatment enhanced apple yield by 70% (1.7-fold) relative to the untreated control. These findings indicate that the “White Pearl” organo-mineral fertilizer NPC (especially at 1% concentration) could serve as an effective supplement to conventional apple farming practices, boosting overall productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays protected apples against spring frost.

Treatment
NPC “White Pearl” foliar sprayse0
Outcome
cryoprotective properties to spring frostse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPC “White Pearl” foliar sprays exhibited cryoprotective properties to spring frosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays elevated bound water content.

Treatment
foliar sprayse1
Outcome
bound water contente0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prevention of cellular dehydration via elevated bound water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“NPC “White Pearl” foliar sprays exhibited cryoprotective properties to spring frosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays accumulated proline and soluble sugars.

Treatment
foliar sprayse1
Outcome
proline and soluble sugarse0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“accumulation of osmoprotective compounds including proline and soluble sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“NPC “White Pearl” foliar sprays exhibited cryoprotective properties to spring frosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments enhanced glucose and starch biosynthesis.

Treatment
applied treatmentse0
Outcome
biosynthesis of glucose and starche0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied treatments improved carbohydrate metabolism by enhancing the biosynthesis of glucose and starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments promoted assimilate outflow into ripening fruit.

Treatment
foliar sprayse1
Outcome
outflow of assimilates into ripening fruitse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promoting a better outflow of assimilates into ripening fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“NPC “White Pearl” foliar sprays exhibited cryoprotective properties to spring frosts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1% treatment increased yield by 70% versus untreated control.

Treatment
1% solution treatmente0
Outcome
apple yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1% solution treatment enhanced apple yield by 70% (1.7-fold) relative to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1189 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose White Pearl as a supplement to apple farming.

Outcome
effective supplement to conventional apple farming practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““White Pearl” organo-mineral fertilizer NPC (especially at 1% concentration) could serve as an effective supplement to conventional apple farming practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1379 · show in text ↑

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · soil: physics · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.