Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Nano Nutrient Foliar Application: Impacts on Yield, Quality, and Nutrient Efficiency in Dryland Finger Millet

Ziya Ul Huq; B. G. Vasanthi; Mudalagiriyappa; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Nitrogen and zinc are the most critical macro‐ and micronutrients that significantly determine the crop productivity. Foliar application of these nutrients is a proven technology to abate acute deficiency at any crop‐growing stage. Recent developments in the field of nanotechnology such as spraying of nano‐urea and nano zinc in combination with conventional fertilizers enhance crop growth and nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of crop. Aim This investigation assessed the impact of nano nutrient foliar sprays on the growth, yield, qualitative and quantitative traits, and nutrient utilization efficiency of finger millet. Methods Experiment was conducted at AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru during Kharif 2021 with finger millet as test crop. It comprises 12 treatments with different levels of nitrogen in combination with foliar application of nano nutrients at 35 and 55 DAS. Results Foliar application of nano‐N and nano‐Zn along with 100% RDN + recommended PK in finger millet significantly enhanced the growth, yield, and nutrient utilization efficiency of finger millet. Application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of nano‐N and nano‐Zn recorded the highest grain yield (3486 kg ha −1 ) and straw yield (4810 kg ha −1 ), significantly outperforming treatments with conventional fertilizers alone. This treatment also improved the qualitative attributes such as the number of ear heads (6.53), length of ear heads (6.95 cm), and dry weight per plant (146.80 g). Similar was the trend with antioxidant enzymes, namely, catalase and peroxidase activity, proximate composition of finger millet grain with higher crude protein (8.88%), crude fiber (2.90%), ash (2.40%), and fat (1.46%). Moreover, this treatment also recorded the highest economic returns, with gross returns of Rs. 108,192 ha −1 and net returns of Rs. 79,579 ha −1 , making it the most effective and beneficial strategy for finger millet cultivation under dryland conditions. Conclusion The productivity and NUE of finger millet were higher with foliar application of nano nutrients along with 75% RDN + recommended PK and were found to be cost‐effective compared to conventional fertilizers alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano nitrogen and zinc with recommended fertilization increased finger millet growth and nutrient use efficiency.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
Foliar application of nano‐N and nano‐Zn along with 100% RDN + recommended PKe0
Outcome
growth, yield, and nutrient utilization efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of nano‐N and nano‐Zn along with 100% RDN + recommended PK in finger millet significantly enhanced the growth, yield, and nutrient utilization efficiency of finger millet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano nutrient spray with full fertilizer gave the highest grain yield of 3486 kg per hectare.

Taxon
nano‐Ne0
Treatment
100% RDF + foliar spray of nano‐N and nano‐Zne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3486 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
treatments with conventional fertilizers alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of nano‐N and nano‐Zn recorded the highest grain yield (3486 kg ha −1 ) and straw yield (4810 kg ha −1 ), significantly outperforming treatments with conventional fertilizers alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano nutrient spray with full fertilizer gave the highest straw yield of 4810 kg per hectare.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
100% RDF + foliar spray of nano‐N and nano‐Zne0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4810 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
treatments with conventional fertilizers alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF + foliar spray of nano‐N and nano‐Zn recorded the highest grain yield (3486 kg ha −1 ) and straw yield (4810 kg ha −1 ), significantly outperforming treatments with conventional fertilizers alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    NP (67.2 kg N/ha) gave finger millet grain yields similar to NPK application (11.4 and 10.5 q/ha).

    Additive effect of fertilizer applications on rainfed finger millet. · 1975 · compared with NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) application

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.