Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Effects of No-Tillage on Field Microclimate and Yield of Winter Wheat

Zhiqiang Dong; Shuo Yang; Si Li; et al.

12
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in the North China Plain (NCP) during the 2023–2024 season to investigate the vertical microclimate, yield, and yield-related characteristics of winter wheat during the grain-filling stage under no-till direct seeding and conventional tillage. The aim was to compare the differences in microclimate between the two tillage methods in wheat fields and the impact of microclimate on yield. The results indicated that, compared to conventional tillage, no-till direct seeding reduced the air temperature and increased the relative humidity of the air at 20 cm and 100 cm above the ground during the wheat grain-filling period. The soil moisture content at 20 cm below the ground under no-till direct seeding was higher than under conventional tillage during the early grain-filling stage. Seven days before the wheat harvest, the dry weight per plant and the dry weight per spike were significantly greater under no-till direct seeding than under conventional tillage. Consequently, the thousand-grain weight of no-till direct seeding was significantly higher than that of conventional tillage, with an increase of 7.9%. The number of wheat sterile spikelets under no-till direct seeding was significantly lower than that under conventional tillage. Furthermore, the number of grains per spike was higher than that of conventional tillage. Although the number of harvested spikes under no-till direct seeding was 10.8% lower than under conventional tillage, the increase in thousand-grain weight and the number of grains per spike compensated for the reduced number of harvested spikes. As a result, the grain yield of winter wheat under no-till direct seeding was higher than that of conventional tillage, increasing by 2.7%. Therefore, adopting no-till direct seeding in the NCP is conducive to increasing winter wheat production and efficiency, as well as supporting sustainable agricultural development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till direct seeding reduced air temperature.

Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
air temperaturee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0
Setting
20 cm and 100 cm above the grounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to conventional tillage, no-till direct seeding reduced the air temperature and increased the relative humidity of the air at 20 cm and 100 cm above the ground during the wheat grain-filling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till direct seeding increased relative air humidity.

Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
relative humidity of the aire0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0
Setting
20 cm and 100 cm above the grounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to conventional tillage, no-till direct seeding reduced the air temperature and increased the relative humidity of the air at 20 cm and 100 cm above the ground during the wheat grain-filling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till direct seeding increased early grain filling soil moisture.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
early grain-filling stagee0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil moisture content at 20 cm below the ground under no-till direct seeding was higher than under conventional tillage during the early grain-filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant dry weight was significantly greater seven days before harvest.

Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
dry weight per plante0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven days before the wheat harvest, the dry weight per plant and the dry weight per spike were significantly greater under no-till direct seeding than under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike dry weight was significantly greater seven days before harvest.

Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
dry weight per spikee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven days before the wheat harvest, the dry weight per plant and the dry weight per spike were significantly greater under no-till direct seeding than under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand grain weight increased 7.9% with no till seeding.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
thousand-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.9%e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the thousand-grain weight of no-till direct seeding was significantly higher than that of conventional tillage, with an increase of 7.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No till seeding significantly reduced sterile spikelets.

Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
sterile spikeletse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of wheat sterile spikelets under no-till direct seeding was significantly lower than that under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till seeding increased grains per spike.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of grains per spike was higher than that of conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till seeding reduced harvested spikes by 10.8%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
number of harvested spikese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.8%e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of harvested spikes under no-till direct seeding was 10.8% lower than under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher grain weight and grains per spike compensated for fewer harvested spikes.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
reduced number of harvested spikese0
Qualifier
increase in thousand-grain weight and the number of grains per spikee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in thousand-grain weight and the number of grains per spike compensated for the reduced number of harvested spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till seeding increased winter wheat grain yield by 2.7%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
no-till direct seedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.7%e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of winter wheat under no-till direct seeding was higher than that of conventional tillage, increasing by 2.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1751 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend no till seeding for winter wheat production in the NCP.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
increasing winter wheat production and efficiencye0
Setting
NCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adopting no-till direct seeding in the NCP is conducive to increasing winter wheat production and efficiency, as well as supporting sustainable agricultural development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1932 · show in text ↑

transplanting · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 28 positive, 16 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 32 positive, 16 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

transplanting · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Water seed drill raised soil moisture from 13% to 24%.

    Performance Evaluation of a Water Seed Drill · 2018 · compared with existing 13% soil moisture content

    Same direction

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.