Paper · 2018 · Sustainability

Performance Evaluation of a Water Seed Drill

Rana Shahzad Noor; Zhi Wang; Muhammad Umair; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water content plays a crucial role in seed development, particularly at the seed sowing stage, and it ensures good seed germination. A water seed drill was designed and developed to provide an optimum quantity of water that is required for the soil in the same furrow, right after seed placement. This soil moistening method not only improves the moisture level in the field, but it also saves a large amount of water by applying the needed water quantity in the line of sowing after seed placement. The water seed drill consisted of a wheat seed drill, a water application system, and a tank with 400 L capacity. The water seed drill yielded a 48% higher germination count than when wheat is planted through a conventional method. The data recorded also showed that the water seed drill raised the soil moisture to 24% from the existing 13% soil moisture content. The total operational cost of the water seed drill was 2.57-fold greater than the conventional seed drill, but the output cost of the water seed drill was 2.15 times (49,000 Rs/ha) more than that of the conventional seed drill.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water seed drill produced a 48% higher wheat germination count than conventional planting.

Treatment
water seed drille0
Outcome
germination counte0
Direction
highere0
Value
48%e0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water seed drill yielded a 48% higher germination count than when wheat is planted through a conventional method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water seed drill raised soil moisture from 13% to 24%.

Treatment
water seed drille0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
raisede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
existing 13% soil moisture contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data recorded also showed that the water seed drill raised the soil moisture to 24% from the existing 13% soil moisture content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“when wheat is planted through a conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–730 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water seed drill operational cost was 2.57-fold greater than a conventional seed drill.

Outcome
operational coste0
Direction
greatere0
Value
2.57-folde0
Comparator
conventional seed drille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total operational cost of the water seed drill was 2.57-fold greater than the conventional seed drill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“when wheat is planted through a conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–730 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water seed drill output cost was 2.15 times more than conventional seed drill output cost.

Outcome
output coste0
Direction
moree0
Value
2.15 times (49,000 Rs/ha)e0
Comparator
conventional seed drille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the output cost of the water seed drill was 2.15 times (49,000 Rs/ha) more than that of the conventional seed drill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“when wheat is planted through a conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–730 · show in text ↑

transplanting · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 28 positive, 16 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

transplanting · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.