Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Field Application of Mycorrhizal Inoculant Influences Growth, Nutrition, and Physiological Parameters of Corn Plants and Affects Soil Microbiological Attributes

Paulo Ademar Avelar Ferreira; Carina Marchezan; Gustavo Scopel; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mycorrhizal inoculants can contribute to the development of corn crops by improving crop productivity. In this sense, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a mycorrhizal inoculant on the dynamics of root system growth, gas exchange, corn crop productivity, and microbial activity in the rhizospheric soil in a no-till area with different levels of available soil phosphorus. The experiment was conducted during the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 growing seasons. At 75 days after plant emergence, root morphological parameters (total root length (cm), average root diameter (mm), root surface area (cm2), and root volume), shoot biomass production, P content in the plant shoots, gas exchange, and microbiological attributes of the rhizospheric soil of corn were evaluated. At the end of the cycle, corn grain yield was determined. A beneficial effect of AMF inoculation was observed on the root and shoot parameters regardless of soil P level. Under conditions of evenly distributed rainfall during the experiment (2019/2020 season), AMF inoculation contributed to a 90% increase in acid phosphatase activity and a 76% increase in microbial biomass carbon (C-BIO), independent of soil P level. In contrast, under water deficit conditions (2020/2021 season), AMF inoculation provided a 29% increase in grain yield. We concluded that introducing a commercial mycorrhizal inoculant in corn benefits root system morphological parameters and physiological traits, and favors the activity of enzymes related to increased P availability, contributing to increased crop productivity in a no-till system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation benefited corn root and shoot parameters regardless of soil P level.

Taxon
Corn PlantsZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root and shoot parameterse0
Direction
beneficial effecte0
Qualifier
regardless of soil P levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A beneficial effect of AMF inoculation was observed on the root and shoot parameters regardless of soil P level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased rhizosphere acid phosphatase activity by 90% in the evenly rainy season.

Taxon
Corn PlantsZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
acid phosphatase activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
evenly distributed rainfalle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under conditions of evenly distributed rainfall during the experiment (2019/2020 season), AMF inoculation contributed to a 90% increase in acid phosphatase activity and a 76% increase in microbial biomass carbon (C-BIO), independent of soil P level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation increased rhizosphere microbial biomass carbon by 76% in the evenly rainy season.

Taxon
Corn PlantsZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
microbial biomass carbon (C-BIO)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
76%e0
Qualifier
independent of soil P levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation contributed to a 90% increase in acid phosphatase activity and a 76% increase in microbial biomass carbon (C-BIO), independent of soil P level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit, AMF inoculation increased corn grain yield by 29%.

Taxon
Corn PlantsZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
29%e0
Qualifier
water deficit conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under water deficit conditions (2020/2021 season), AMF inoculation provided a 29% increase in grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

113 papers: 104 positive, 9 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 57 positive, 8 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.