Paper · 2011 · Grassland Science

Effects of inoculation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, aerobic stability and microbial communities in whole crop corn silage

Yanbing Li; Naoki Nishino

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
72
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Whole crop corn silage may be prone to spoilage after exposure to air. To investigate control of fermentation and aerobic spoilage by using silage additives, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus buchneri were added to whole crop corn silage, and shifts in microbial communities were examined. Bacterial and fungal communities were identified by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis at the time of opening the silo and after conducting aerobic deterioration tests. Inoculation of L. rhamnosus did not affect fermentation, whereas that of L. buchneri decreased the lactic acid content and increased the acetic acid content. Aerobic stability was enhanced in silage stored for a long period (120 days), with increases in the acetic acid content even without L. buchneri inoculation. A high aerobic stability was achieved with a shorter ensiling period (56 days) in L. buchneri-inoculated silage. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculation did not alter the indigenous bacterial community, and the inoculated species were detected only as additions. Lactobacillus brevis, Pediococcus parvulus, Weissella confusa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were found in both the pre-ensiled crop and the silage, whereas Weissella paramesenteroides, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus lactis were seen exclusively after ensiling. Inoculation also had little effect on the fungal community during the fermentation process. Candida magnolia, Cryptococcus flavus and Candida intermedia were detected, both in the pre-ensiled crop and the silage, whereas Candida glabrata and Candida quercitrusa were identified exclusively in the silage. Marked changes were seen in the fungal community after aerobic spoilage; Saccharomyces exiguus, Saccharomyces martiniae, Pichia fermentans, Pichia deserticola and Pichia kudriavzevii appeared in the spoiled silage. These results indicated that LAB inoculation produces few changes in bacterial and fungal communities in corn silage and that substantial changes occur in the fungal community when the silage is spoiled.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. rhamnosus inoculation did not affect silage fermentation.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
Inoculation of L. rhamnosuse0
Interactor
L. rhamnosusLacticaseibacillus rhamnosuse0symbiont
Outcome
fermentatione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus
Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus · InteractorClaes IJJ, Schoofs G, Regulski K, Courtin P, Chapot-Chartier M-P, Rolain T, et al. · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of L. rhamnosus did not affect fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. buchneri inoculation decreased lactic acid content.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
L. buchnerie0
Interactor
L. buchnerie0symbiont
Outcome
lactic acid contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“that of L. buchneri decreased the lactic acid content and increased the acetic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–637 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. buchneri inoculation increased acetic acid content.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
L. buchnerie0
Interactor
L. buchnerie0symbiont
Outcome
acetic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“that of L. buchneri decreased the lactic acid content and increased the acetic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–637 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long storage for 120 days enhanced aerobic stability even without L. buchneri inoculation.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
stored for a long period (120 days)e0
Outcome
Aerobic stabilitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
even without L. buchneri inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobic stability was enhanced in silage stored for a long period (120 days), with increases in the acetic acid content even without L. buchneri inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long storage increased acetic acid content even without L. buchneri inoculation.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
stored for a long period (120 days)e0
Outcome
acetic acid contente0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobic stability was enhanced in silage stored for a long period (120 days), with increases in the acetic acid content even without L. buchneri inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. buchneri inoculation achieved high aerobic stability after 56 days of ensiling.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
L. buchneri-inoculatede0
Interactor
L. buchnerie0symbiont
Outcome
aerobic stabilitye0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
shorter ensiling period (56 days)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A high aerobic stability was achieved with a shorter ensiling period (56 days) in L. buchneri-inoculated silage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–909 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactic acid bacterial inoculation did not alter the indigenous bacterial community.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculatione0
Outcome
indigenous bacterial communitye0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculation did not alter the indigenous bacterial community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–997 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculated species were detected only as additions to the silage bacterial community.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Outcome
inoculated species were detected only as additionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculated species were detected only as additions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four bacterial taxa were present both before ensiling and in the silage.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
Lactobacillus brevis, Pediococcus parvulus, Weissella confusa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were found in both the pre-ensiled crop and the silagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Lactobacillus brevis, Pediococcus parvulus, Weissella confusa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were found in both the pre-ensiled crop and the silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three bacterial taxa were seen exclusively after ensiling.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Outcome
Weissella paramesenteroides, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus lactis were seen exclusively after ensilinge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Weissella paramesenteroides, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus lactis were seen exclusively after ensiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1325 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation had little effect on the fungal community during fermentation.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
fungal communitye0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation also had little effect on the fungal community during the fermentation process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1418 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three fungal taxa were detected before ensiling and in silage.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
Candida magnolia, Cryptococcus flavus and Candida intermedia were detected, both in the pre-ensiled crop and the silagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Candida magnolia, Cryptococcus flavus and Candida intermedia were detected, both in the pre-ensiled crop and the silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two fungal taxa occurred exclusively in silage.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Outcome
Candida glabrata and Candida quercitrusa were identified exclusively in the silagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Candida glabrata and Candida quercitrusa were identified exclusively in the silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1630 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five fungal taxa appeared in spoiled silage.

Taxon
whole crop corne1
Outcome
Saccharomyces exiguus, Saccharomyces martiniae, Pichia fermentans, Pichia deserticola and Pichia kudriavzevii appeared in the spoiled silagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Saccharomyces exiguus, Saccharomyces martiniae, Pichia fermentans, Pichia deserticola and Pichia kudriavzevii appeared in the spoiled silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1845 · show in text ↑
e1

“whole crop corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–245 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: postharvest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 57 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.