Paper · 2024 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Efficacy of Biopesticides, Insect Growth Regulators and Insect Growth Regulator Along with Insecticides Ready Combi Products Against Aphid in Okra

V.R. Tathode; S.B. Kharbade; R.S. Wasu; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Eight insecticidal treatments (including biopesticides, IGR, IGR and insecticides ready combi products) were evaluated against aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover) in okra. The results revealed that buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP proved effective in minimizing the A. gossypii. However, it was found at par with pyriproxyfen 5% + fenpropathrin 15% EC. Among biopesticides, azadirachtin 1% EC (10000 ppm) and Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 % WP were effective at reducing aphid population and better option for managing pest in organic farming. No deleterious effect of these tested treatments was observed on the natural enemies. Maximum okra pod yield was obtained with buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP (77.58 q/ha) and it proved to be the economically viable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin plus acephate minimized aphids in okra.

Treatment
buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WPe0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
A. gossypiie0
Direction
minimizinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP proved effective in minimizing the A. gossypii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyriproxyfen plus fenpropathrin was at par with buprofezin plus acephate for aphid control.

Treatment
pyriproxyfen 5% + fenpropathrin 15% ECe0
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was found at par with pyriproxyfen 5% + fenpropathrin 15% EC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin reduced aphid populations in okra.

Treatment
azadirachtin 1% EC (10000 ppm)e0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“azadirachtin 1% EC (10000 ppm) and Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 % WP were effective at reducing aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lecanicillium lecanii reduced aphid populations in okra.

Treatment
Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 % WPe0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Second interactor
Lecanicillium lecaniiAkanthomyces lecaniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Akanthomyces lecanii
Akanthomyces lecanii · Second interactorStephen Thorpe · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“azadirachtin 1% EC (10000 ppm) and Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 % WP were effective at reducing aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested treatments showed no deleterious effect on natural enemies in okra.

Treatment
these tested treatmentse0
Outcome
No deleterious effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No deleterious effect of these tested treatments was observed on the natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin plus acephate produced the maximum okra pod yield of 77.58 q/ha.

Treatment
buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WPe0
Outcome
okra pod yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
77.58 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum okra pod yield was obtained with buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP (77.58 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin plus acephate was economically viable for okra.

Treatment
buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WPe0
Outcome
economically viablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP (77.58 q/ha) and it proved to be the economically viable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphid in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 · show in text ↑

buprofezin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

buprofezin · Aphis gossypii · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acephate · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Akanthomyces lecanii · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

azadirachtin · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.