Abstract
Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018. Imidacloprid (0.004%) was found to be most effective treatment against Aphis gossypii Glover and Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida amongst all the insecticides followed by thiamethoxam (0.05%). For the remaining treatments, the decreasing order of efficacy based on the % reduction in aphid incidence was buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, fenazaquin and spriromesifen whereas in case of jassids the decreasing order of efficacy was cypermethrin, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, spiromesifen and fenazaquin. Imidacloprid treated plots resulted in maximum fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratio followed by thiamethoxam, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, spiromesifen and fenazaquin.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid was the most effective treatment against Aphis gossypii and Amrasca biguttula biguttula among all the insecticides.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- Imidacloprid (0.004%)e1
- Interactor
- Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypiie1pest - Second interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- effective treatmente1
- Direction
- most effectivee1
- Comparator
- all the insecticidese1
- Setting
- kharif 2018e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018”
e1“Imidacloprid (0.004%) was found to be most effective treatment against Aphis gossypii Glover and Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida amongst all the insecticides followed by thiamethoxam (0.05%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam followed imidacloprid as an effective treatment against the aphid and jassid pests of okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam (0.05%)e1
- Interactor
- Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiie1pest
- Outcome
- effective treatmente1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Comparator
- Imidacloprid (0.004%)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018”
e1“Imidacloprid (0.004%) was found to be most effective treatment against Aphis gossypii Glover and Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida amongst all the insecticides followed by thiamethoxam (0.05%)”
Claim · model-written summary
For the remaining treatments, the decreasing order of aphid incidence reduction was buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, fenazaquin and spiromesifen.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- remaining treatmentse2
- Interactor
- aphide2pest
- Outcome
- decreasing order of efficacye2
- Direction
- decreasing order of efficacye2
- Qualifier
- buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, fenazaquin and spriromesifene2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018”
e2“For the remaining treatments, the decreasing order of efficacy based on the % reduction in aphid incidence was buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, fenazaquin and spriromesifen”
Claim · model-written summary
For jassids, the decreasing order of efficacy was cypermethrin, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, spiromesifen and fenazaquin.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- cypermethrin, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, spiromesifen and fenazaquine3
- Interactor
- jassidse3pest
- Outcome
- decreasing order of efficacye3
- Direction
- decreasing order of efficacye3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018”
e3“whereas in case of jassids the decreasing order of efficacy was cypermethrin, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, spiromesifen and fenazaquin”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid-treated plots gave the maximum fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid treated plotse4
- Outcome
- fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratioe4
- Direction
- maximume4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018”
e4“Imidacloprid treated plots resulted in maximum fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratio followed by thiamethoxam, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, spiromesifen and fenazaquin”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam, buprofezin and chlorantraniliprole followed imidacloprid in fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprolee4
- Outcome
- fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratioe4
- Direction
- followed bye4
- Comparator
- Imidacloprid treated plotse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018”
e4“Imidacloprid treated plots resulted in maximum fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratio followed by thiamethoxam, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, spiromesifen and fenazaquin”
Claim · model-written summary
Cypermethrin, spiromesifen and fenazaquin followed imidacloprid in fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- cypermethrin, spiromesifen and fenazaquine4
- Outcome
- fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratioe4
- Direction
- followed bye4
- Comparator
- Imidacloprid treated plotse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of seven insecticides buprofezin (0.04%), chlorantraniliprole (0.005%), fenazaquin (0.025%), imidacloprid (0.004%), spiromesifen (0.02%), thiamethoxam (0.05%) and cypermethrin (0.014%) was evaluated against sucking pests infesting okra at CSK HPKV Palampur during kharif 2018”
e4“Imidacloprid treated plots resulted in maximum fruit yield and incremental cost benefit ratio followed by thiamethoxam, buprofezin, chlorantraniliprole, cypermethrin, spiromesifen and fenazaquin”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
chlorantraniliprole · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →thiamethoxam · Aphis gossypii · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
buprofezin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
cypermethrin · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fenazaquin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
spiromesifen · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · Aphis gossypii · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.