Paper · 2024 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Eco-friendly Management of Fusarium Wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi) of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Manish Kumar; Sunil Zacharia; Pankaj Kumar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pea is one of the most important Rabi pulse crop of India. Fusarium wilt which is caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi is considered to be the most devastating disease of this crop. The general inadequacy of chemical fungicides to tackle Fusarium wilt in field pea has lead to the search for ecofriendly management to these diseases. Therefore, present study “Eco-friendly management of wilt of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi” was carried out in Rabi season in the year 2023-24 under field conditions. Effects of treatments were evaluated on disease incidence and different growth and yield parameters of field pea. Among the treatments the disease incidence (%) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly decreased in treatment T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (12.03%), (17.59%) and (24.07%). The plant height (cm) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly increased in T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (23.36cm), (36.76cm) and (52.04cm) respectively. The yield (q/ha) was significantly increased in T4 – Neem cake (S.A). + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (10.7q/ha) respectively as compared to control T0.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 lowered Fusarium wilt incidence to 12.03% at 30 DAS.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma viride (S.T.)Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence (%)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12.03%e0
Qualifier
30, 60 and 90 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments the disease incidence (%) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly decreased in treatment T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (12.03%), (17.59%) and (24.07%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 lowered Fusarium wilt incidence to 17.59% at 60 DAS.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma viride (S.T.)Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence (%)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17.59%e0
Qualifier
30, 60 and 90 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments the disease incidence (%) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly decreased in treatment T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (12.03%), (17.59%) and (24.07%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 lowered Fusarium wilt incidence to 24.07% at 90 DAS.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma viride (S.T.)Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidence (%)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
24.07%e0
Qualifier
30, 60 and 90 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments the disease incidence (%) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly decreased in treatment T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (12.03%), (17.59%) and (24.07%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased field pea height to 23.36cm at 30 DAS.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma viride (S.T.)Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height (cm)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23.36cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height (cm) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly increased in T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (23.36cm), (36.76cm) and (52.04cm) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased field pea height to 36.76cm at 60 DAS.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma viride (S.T.)Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height (cm)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.76cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height (cm) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly increased in T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (23.36cm), (36.76cm) and (52.04cm) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased field pea height to 52.04cm at 90 DAS.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma viride (S.T.)Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height (cm)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
52.04cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height (cm) at 30, 60 and 90 DAS was significantly increased in T4 − Neem cake (S.A.) + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (23.36cm), (36.76cm) and (52.04cm) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 increased field pea yield to 10.7q/ha versus control T0.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T4 – Neem cake (S.A). + Trichoderma viride (S.T.)e0
Interactor
Trichoderma viride (S.T.)Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yield (q/ha)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.7q/hae0
Comparator
control T0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield (q/ha) was significantly increased in T4 – Neem cake (S.A). + Trichoderma viride (S.T.) (10.7q/ha) respectively as compared to control T0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma viride · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Trichoderma viride · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

botanical · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 37 positive, 25 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

botanical · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.