Paper · 2024 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Responses of Photosynthetic Characteristics, and Agronomic Attributes to Sowing Methods of Winter Wheat

H. Noor; F. Noor; M. F. Seleiman; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of different sowing methods on the growth, gas exchange and yield traits of dryland winter wheat. Furthermore, the effect of N input rates was also evaluated on soil water consumption. The seeds of winter wheat were sown using wide space sowing (WS), furrow sowing (FS), stereoscopic sowing (SS), and drill sowing (DS). The results indicated that the different sowing methods significantly affected the yield and grain quality. Increase in grain yield was 25, 17, and 11% respectively under WS, FS, and AS as compared to DS. The water consumption in the 0–200 cm soil layer from sowing to jointing was highest under WS which mainly in deep soil layers. The photosynthetic traits and leaf area index were highest under WS followed by FS. The plant height was highest under DS. The water consumption index and grain yield were higher at 210–240 kg/ha than other N rates. The difference between sowing method was significant on 1000-grain mass, Spike number, Grain number per spike, leaf area index (LAI), promote the transpiration of flag leaves, intercellular CO2, yield were the highest under WSS compared to others sowing methods. The yield, and three factors were the highest in N240 kg/ha, and enhances Photosynthetic Characteristics of flag leaves, the spike number, and yield had significant difference compared with other N application rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide space sowing increased grain yield by 25% relative to drill sowing.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
WSe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Increasee0
Value
25e0
Comparator
DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in grain yield was 25, 17, and 11% respectively under WS, FS, and AS as compared to DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow sowing increased grain yield by 17% relative to drill sowing.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FSe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Increasee0
Value
17e0
Comparator
DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in grain yield was 25, 17, and 11% respectively under WS, FS, and AS as compared to DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AS increased grain yield by 11% relative to drill sowing.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Increasee0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in grain yield was 25, 17, and 11% respectively under WS, FS, and AS as compared to DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water consumption from sowing to jointing was highest with WS.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
WSe0
Outcome
water consumptione0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
0–200 cm soil layer from sowing to jointinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water consumption in the 0–200 cm soil layer from sowing to jointing was highest under WS which mainly in deep soil layers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic traits and leaf area index were highest under WS, followed by FS.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
WSe0
Outcome
photosynthetic traits and leaf area indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
FSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic traits and leaf area index were highest under WS followed by FS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was highest under DS.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height was highest under DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water consumption index and grain yield were higher at 210–240 kg/ha than at other nitrogen rates.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
210–240 kg/hae0
Outcome
water consumption index and grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other N ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water consumption index and grain yield were higher at 210–240 kg/ha than other N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand grain mass, spike number, grains per spike and leaf area index were highest under WSS.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
WSSe0
Outcome
1000-grain mass, Spike number, Grain number per spikee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
others sowing methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1000-grain mass, Spike number, Grain number per spike, leaf area index (LAI), promote the transpiration of flag leaves, intercellular CO2, yield were the highest under WSS compared to others sowing methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf transpiration, intercellular CO2 and yield were highest under WSS.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
WSSe0
Outcome
transpiration of flag leaves, intercellular CO2, yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
others sowing methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the transpiration of flag leaves, intercellular CO2, yield were the highest under WSS compared to others sowing methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and its three factors were highest at N240 kg/ha.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N240 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield, and three factorse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield, and three factors were the highest in N240 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf photosynthetic characteristics and spike number differed significantly with nitrogen rate.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N application ratese0
Outcome
Photosynthetic Characteristics of flag leaves, the spike number, and yielde0
Comparator
other N application ratese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhances Photosynthetic Characteristics of flag leaves, the spike number, and yield had significant difference compared with other N application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.