Paper · 2024 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Efficacy of newer insecticides against aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover) in Bt cotton

SH Timke; Kadam; SD Aher

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nine newer insecticides were evaluated against cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii during Kharif 2018 and 2019. The results revealed that all the insecticidal treatments was significantly effective against aphids over control. The results indicated that among all insecticides clothianidin 50 WDG, diafenthiuron 50 WP and thiamethoxam 25 WG was found most effective in reducing aphid population whereas lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC was found less effective in controlling aphid population.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested insecticides significantly controlled aphids relative to control.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
insecticidal treatmentse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
effectivee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“all the insecticidal treatments was significantly effective against aphids over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clothianidin 50 WDG was among the most effective at reducing aphid population.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
clothianidin 50 WDGe0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“clothianidin 50 WDG, diafenthiuron 50 WP and thiamethoxam 25 WG was found most effective in reducing aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diafenthiuron 50 WP was among the most effective at reducing aphid population.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
diafenthiuron 50 WPe0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“clothianidin 50 WDG, diafenthiuron 50 WP and thiamethoxam 25 WG was found most effective in reducing aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 25 WG was among the most effective at reducing aphid population.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
thiamethoxam 25 WGe0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“clothianidin 50 WDG, diafenthiuron 50 WP and thiamethoxam 25 WG was found most effective in reducing aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC was less effective at controlling aphid population.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
lambda cyhalothrin 5 ECe0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
less effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC was found less effective in controlling aphid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑

lambda-cyhalothrin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

diafenthiuron · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

clothianidin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

insecticide · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.