Abstract
It was concluded that zero tillage with 2.5 t/ha residue of chickpea crop and combined inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AM Fungi gave higher productivity and profitability as well as enhanced macro and micro nutrients in grain and stover of summer greengram over the other methods of crop establishment, viz. conventional and zero tillage without microbial inoculation. Thus farmers may inoculate with combination of Rhizobium+ PSB + AM Fungi in summer greengram and sow the crop through zero tillage with 2.5 t/ ha crop residue to get higher productivity, profitability and nutrient concentration in grain.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage with 2.5 t/ha chickpea residue plus Rhizobium, PSB and AM fungi inoculation gave higher productivity and profitability of summer greengram than conventional and zero tillage without inoculation.
- Taxon
- summer greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae1 - Treatment
- zero tillage with 2.5 t/ha residue of chickpea crop and combined inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AM Fungie1
- Second interactor
- AM FungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- productivity and profitabilitye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- conventional and zero tillage without microbial inoculatione1
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e1“zero tillage with 2.5 t/ha residue of chickpea crop and combined inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AM Fungi gave higher productivity and profitability as well as enhanced macro and micro nutrients in grain and stover of summer greengram over the other methods of crop establishment, viz. conventional and zero tillage without microbial inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
The same inoculation with residue enhanced macro and micro nutrients in grain and stover of summer greengram.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Organ / stage
- grain and stovere1
- Treatment
- zero tillage with 2.5 t/ha residue of chickpea crop and combined inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AM Fungie1
- Second interactor
- AM FungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- macro and micro nutrientse1
- Direction
- enhancede1
- Comparator
- conventional and zero tillage without microbial inoculatione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e1“zero tillage with 2.5 t/ha residue of chickpea crop and combined inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AM Fungi gave higher productivity and profitability as well as enhanced macro and micro nutrients in grain and stover of summer greengram over the other methods of crop establishment, viz. conventional and zero tillage without microbial inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmers may inoculate summer greengram with Rhizobium, PSB and AM fungi and sow through zero tillage with 2.5 t/ha crop residue to obtain higher productivity, profitability and grain nutrient concentration.
- Taxon
- summer greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae1
- Treatment
- inoculate with combination of Rhizobium+ PSB + AM Fungie1
- Interactor
- AM FungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- higher productivity, profitability and nutrient concentration in graine1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer greengram (Vigna radiata)”
e1“Thus farmers may inoculate with combination of Rhizobium+ PSB + AM Fungi in summer greengram and sow the crop through zero tillage with 2.5 t/ ha crop residue to get higher productivity, profitability and nutrient concentration in grain”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →Cicer arietinum · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
28 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
180 papers more in this group
See all 184 papers →mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.