Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of the application of nano-urea on growth and nutrient uptake of rabi maize (Zea mays L.)

Raju Bhukya; Pankaj Raundal; Najan Vishakha Rajendra; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation on “Effect of the application of Nano urea on growth and nutrient uptake of rabi maize (Zea mays L.) was conducted during rabi 2022-2023 at Agronomy farm, College of Agriculture, Pune. The experiment was laid out with 13 treatments in Randomized Block Design with three replications, consist of 13 treatments. The values of growth attribute were significantly maximum with 75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano urea . Similarly the grain yield and straw yield was recorded higher in treatment T3. The significantly higher nitrogen , phosphorus and potassium uptake by maize crop was obtained with application of 75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano urea than rest of the treatment. The corresponding values are (178.58, 37.31 and 103.43) NPK kg ha-1 respectively. Whereas, lowest nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake was registered with absolute control i.e. T1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% urea N plus 25% nano urea foliar treatment maximized growth attributes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano ureae0
Outcome
growth attributee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of growth attribute were significantly maximum with 75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano urea .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the application of nano-urea on growth and nutrient uptake of rabi maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had higher grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield and straw yield was recorded higher in treatment T3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the application of nano-urea on growth and nutrient uptake of rabi maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had higher straw yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield and straw yield was recorded higher in treatment T3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the application of nano-urea on growth and nutrient uptake of rabi maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nano urea combination increased N uptake to 178.58 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano ureae0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
178.58e0
Qualifier
NPK kg ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly higher nitrogen , phosphorus and potassium uptake by maize crop was obtained with application of 75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano urea than rest of the treatment. The corresponding values are (178.58, 37.31 and 103.43) NPK kg ha-1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nano urea combination increased P uptake to 37.31 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano ureae0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
highere0
Value
37.31e0
Qualifier
NPK kg ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly higher nitrogen , phosphorus and potassium uptake by maize crop was obtained with application of 75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano urea than rest of the treatment. The corresponding values are (178.58, 37.31 and 103.43) NPK kg ha-1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nano urea combination increased K uptake to 103.43 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano ureae0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
highere0
Value
103.43e0
Qualifier
NPK kg ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly higher nitrogen , phosphorus and potassium uptake by maize crop was obtained with application of 75% N through urea + 25% N through two foliar spray of IFFCO Nano urea than rest of the treatment. The corresponding values are (178.58, 37.31 and 103.43) NPK kg ha-1 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–846 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absolute control had the lowest N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
absolute control i.e. T1e0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptakee0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake was registered with absolute control i.e. T1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the application of nano-urea on growth and nutrient uptake of rabi maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 161 positive, 21 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.