Paper · 2024 · Journal of Ecological Engineering

Foliar Boron Application and Row Spacing Effects on Growth, Yield and Protein Contents of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.)

Yahya Bani Khalaf; Abdallah Aldahadha; Osama Migdadi; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sufficient supply of foliar boron is essential for the appropriate productivity of lentil, particularly in poorly fertile soil. Therefore, field experiments were carried out at two locations (Maru and Mushaqar) in Jordan during the winter growing season 2021/2022 to evaluating the impact of foliar boron levels (0, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.6%) on the physiology, growth, yield, and grain protein contents of the local lentil variety (Jordan 2) under different row spacing (17.5 and 35 cm). The results revealed that the Maru location outperformed another location for increasing transpiration rate, plant height, days to flowering, yield, and yield attributes while reducing protein contents. Row spacing of 35 cm had significantly higher physiological performance, yield, and yield attributes than row spacing of 17.5 cm, except for instantaneous water use efficiency, straw yield, and thousand seed weight. Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment since it increased total chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and protein content by 9.5, 39.9, 22.2, 25.9, and 11.2%, respectively. Furthermore, foliar 0.2% boron improved grain yield higher at row spacing of 35 cm than those at row spacing of 17.5 cm. However, foliar 0.6% boron decreased grain yield by 8.5% and 3.6% at row spacing 35 cm and 17.5 cm, respectively, indicating this high concentration of boron acts as toxicity. Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing. These results suggest that optimum row spacing and foliar boron are useful approaches for lentil’s sustainability in semiarid areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Maru location, compared with another location, increased transpiration rate, plant height and days to flowering in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Maru locatione2
Outcome
transpiration rate, plant height, days to floweringe2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
another locatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results revealed that the Maru location outperformed another location for increasing transpiration rate, plant height, days to flowering, yield, and yield attributes while reducing protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Maru location, compared with another location, increased yield and yield attributes of lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Maru locatione2
Outcome
yield, and yield attributese2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
another locatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results revealed that the Maru location outperformed another location for increasing transpiration rate, plant height, days to flowering, yield, and yield attributes while reducing protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Maru location, compared with another location, decreased protein contents of lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Maru locatione2
Outcome
protein contentse2
Direction
reducinge2
Comparator
another locatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results revealed that the Maru location outperformed another location for increasing transpiration rate, plant height, days to flowering, yield, and yield attributes while reducing protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing of 35 cm gave significantly higher physiological performance, yield and yield attributes than 17.5 cm in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Row spacing of 35 cme3
Outcome
physiological performance, yield, and yield attributese3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
row spacing of 17.5 cme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e3

“Row spacing of 35 cm had significantly higher physiological performance, yield, and yield attributes than row spacing of 17.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For instantaneous water use efficiency, straw yield and thousand seed weight, the advantage of 35 cm row spacing over 17.5 cm was absent.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Row spacing of 35 cme3
Outcome
instantaneous water use efficiency, straw yield, and thousand seed weighte4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
row spacing of 17.5 cme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e3

“Row spacing of 35 cm had significantly higher physiological performance, yield, and yield attributes than row spacing of 17.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–813 · show in text ↑
e4

“except for instantaneous water use efficiency, straw yield, and thousand seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Foliar 0.2% borone5
Outcome
best treatmente5
Direction
beste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment since it increased total chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and protein content by 9.5, 39.9, 22.2, 25.9, and 11.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.2% boron increased total chlorophyll content in lentil by 9.5%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Foliar 0.2% borone5
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente5
Direction
increasede5
Value
9.5e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment since it increased total chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and protein content by 9.5, 39.9, 22.2, 25.9, and 11.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.2% boron increased stomatal conductance in lentil by 39.9%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Foliar 0.2% borone5
Outcome
stomatal conductancee5
Direction
increasede5
Value
39.9e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment since it increased total chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and protein content by 9.5, 39.9, 22.2, 25.9, and 11.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.2% boron increased transpiration in lentil by 22.2%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Foliar 0.2% borone5
Outcome
transpiratione5
Direction
increasede5
Value
22.2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment since it increased total chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and protein content by 9.5, 39.9, 22.2, 25.9, and 11.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.2% boron increased photosynthetic rate in lentil by 25.9%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Foliar 0.2% borone5
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee5
Direction
increasede5
Value
25.9e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment since it increased total chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and protein content by 9.5, 39.9, 22.2, 25.9, and 11.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.2% boron increased protein content in lentil by 11.2%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Foliar 0.2% borone5
Outcome
protein contente5
Direction
increasede5
Value
11.2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar 0.2% boron was the best treatment since it increased total chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rate, and protein content by 9.5, 39.9, 22.2, 25.9, and 11.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.2% boron increased grain yield more at 35 cm row spacing than at 17.5 cm in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
foliar 0.2% borone6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
at row spacing of 35 cme6
Comparator
row spacing of 17.5 cme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e6

“Furthermore, foliar 0.2% boron improved grain yield higher at row spacing of 35 cm than those at row spacing of 17.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1236 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.6% boron decreased grain yield of lentil by 8.5% at 35 cm row spacing.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
foliar 0.6% borone7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
8.5%e7
Qualifier
at row spacing 35 cm and 17.5 cm, respectivelye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, foliar 0.6% boron decreased grain yield by 8.5% and 3.6% at row spacing 35 cm and 17.5 cm, respectively, indicating this high concentration of boron acts as toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.6% boron decreased grain yield of lentil by 3.6% at 17.5 cm row spacing.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
foliar 0.6% borone7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
decreasede7
Value
3.6%e7
Qualifier
at row spacing 35 cm and 17.5 cm, respectivelye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, foliar 0.6% boron decreased grain yield by 8.5% and 3.6% at row spacing 35 cm and 17.5 cm, respectively, indicating this high concentration of boron acts as toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1412 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A high concentration of foliar boron acts as a toxicity that lowers grain yield of lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
grain yielde7
Qualifier
high concentration of boron acts as toxicitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, foliar 0.6% boron decreased grain yield by 8.5% and 3.6% at row spacing 35 cm and 17.5 cm, respectively, indicating this high concentration of boron acts as toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1412 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron at 0.2% to 0.3% is recommended to enhance seed yield and protein content of lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3%e0
Qualifier
to enhance the seed yield and protein contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum row spacing and foliar boron are useful approaches for lentil sustainability in semiarid areas.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
optimum row spacing and foliar borone1
Qualifier
useful approaches for lentil’s sustainabilitye1
Setting
semiarid arease1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it is highly recommended to use foliar rates of boron ranging between 0.2% and 0.3% to enhance the seed yield and protein content of lentils at different row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1588 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results suggest that optimum row spacing and foliar boron are useful approaches for lentil’s sustainability in semiarid areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1721 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

boron atom · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

climate site · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

climate site · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

density · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.