Paper · 2023 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of Iron and Urea Application on Iron Biofortification of Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)

Amandeep Kaur; Guriqbal Singh; Kuldeep Singh; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Agronomic biofortification with iron (Fe) may be a viable approach to combat the widespread deficiency of Fe in humans. Thus, the present study was conducted to examine the effect of Fe and urea foliar application on Fe biofortification in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). The field experiments were conducted at two locations viz. Ludhiana and Faridkot, India. Different treatment combinations of foliar spray of sole Fe (0.5% of FeSO4.7 H2O), sole urea (2% urea), and combined application of Fe and urea at flowering, pod formation, and flowering + pod formation stages along with unsprayed control were applied to lentil. The results of the study revealed that the combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stages was the most effective in enhancing grain yield, Fe and zinc (Zn) concentration in plants (at flowering as well as pod formation stage), stover and grain (whole and split). The highest Fe concentration in whole (36% higher over control) as well as split (32.9% higher over control) grain and protein content (21% higher over control) was obtained with foliar application of Fe + urea at flowering + pod formation stages. Conclusively, the combined foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4.7 H2O and 2% urea at flowering + pod formation stages may prove to be a feasible option for increasing grain yield and enrichment of lentils with Fe and Zn to combat micronutrient malnutrition in human populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation was most effective for grain yield.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results of the study revealed that the combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stages was the most effective in enhancing grain yield, Fe and zinc (Zn) concentration in plants (at flowering as well as pod formation stage), stover and grain (whole and split).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation was most effective for Fe.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results of the study revealed that the combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stages was the most effective in enhancing grain yield, Fe and zinc (Zn) concentration in plants (at flowering as well as pod formation stage), stover and grain (whole and split).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation was most effective for zinc (Zn).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
zinc (Zn)e0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results of the study revealed that the combined foliar application of Fe and urea at flowering + pod formation stages was the most effective in enhancing grain yield, Fe and zinc (Zn) concentration in plants (at flowering as well as pod formation stage), stover and grain (whole and split).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation raised Fe concentration in whole by 36% versus control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar application of Fe + urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
Fe concentration in wholee0
Direction
highere0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest Fe concentration in whole (36% higher over control) as well as split (32.9% higher over control) grain and protein content (21% higher over control) was obtained with foliar application of Fe + urea at flowering + pod formation stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation raised split by 32.9% versus control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar application of Fe + urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
splite0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest Fe concentration in whole (36% higher over control) as well as split (32.9% higher over control) grain and protein content (21% higher over control) was obtained with foliar application of Fe + urea at flowering + pod formation stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe and urea at flowering and pod formation raised protein content by 21% versus control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar application of Fe + urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest Fe concentration in whole (36% higher over control) as well as split (32.9% higher over control) grain and protein content (21% higher over control) was obtained with foliar application of Fe + urea at flowering + pod formation stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined Fe and urea foliar application to raise lentil yield and Fe and Zn enrichment.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4.7 H2O and 2% urea at flowering + pod formation stagese0
Outcome
increasing grain yield and enrichment of lentils with Fe and Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combined foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4.7 H2O and 2% urea at flowering + pod formation stages may prove to be a feasible option for increasing grain yield and enrichment of lentils with Fe and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1382 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

stage · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

stage · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.