Paper · 2024 · New Zealand Journal of Botany

Rice sheath blight disease control by native endophytic Bacillus subtilis from Kuttanad, a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System

Gopika Vijayakumari Krishnan; Billu Abraham; Ravi Shankar Lankalapalli; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Kuttanad in India is known as ‘the rice bowl of Kerala’ and renowned for its unique rice cultivation system that is below sea level. However, rice production in this wetland ecosystem is seriously threatened by sheath blight disease caused by the fungus Rhizoctonia solani, which has resulted in a significant decline in grain quality and a 50% loss in yield. In the present study, we isolated two endophytic Bacillus subtilis strains, NIIST B616 and NIIST B627, from the roots of rice plants growing in the Kuttanad region and tested their efficacy in controlling sheath blight disease. We found that rice plants inoculated with a combination of both Bacillus strains and R. solani had a 64.71% lower disease incidence and a 31.02% higher harvest index than plants treated with R. solani alone. An analysis of defence-related enzymes and chemicals revealed that treatment with both isolates together greatly enhanced levels of l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL; 2.8 fold), peroxidase (POX; 7.4 fold), polyphenol oxidase (PPO; 4.5 fold), and total phenol (8.5 fold) compared with plants treated solely with R. solani, indicating that these isolates significantly increased plant defence responses through induced systemic resistance (ISR), and this finding was validated through a split-root experiment. More detailed analysis using gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) techniques revealed that cyclo-(Pro-Leu) and cyclo-(Pro-Phe) were the major components responsible for the antifungal properties of the two isolates and their capacity to trigger ISR in plants. Thus, the Bacillus strains and their metabolites may be deemed viable alternatives for controlling the prevalence of sheath blight disease in rice plants and augmenting rice production at unique locations such as Kuttanad.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Bacillus inoculation lowered rice sheath blight incidence by 64.71%.

Treatment
inoculated with a combination of both Bacillus strains and R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
64.71%e0
Comparator
plants treated with R. solani alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice plants inoculated with a combination of both Bacillus strains and R. solani had a 64.71% lower disease incidence and a 31.02% higher harvest index than plants treated with R. solani alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Bacillus inoculation raised rice harvest index by 31.02%.

Treatment
inoculated with a combination of both Bacillus strains and R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
31.02%e0
Comparator
plants treated with R. solani alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice plants inoculated with a combination of both Bacillus strains and R. solani had a 64.71% lower disease incidence and a 31.02% higher harvest index than plants treated with R. solani alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined isolates increased PAL level 2.8 fold relative to R. solani alone.

Treatment
treatment with both isolates togethere0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyasee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
2.8 folde0
Comparator
plants treated solely with R. solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with both isolates together greatly enhanced levels of l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL; 2.8 fold), peroxidase (POX; 7.4 fold), polyphenol oxidase (PPO; 4.5 fold), and total phenol (8.5 fold) compared with plants treated solely with R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined isolates increased peroxidase level 7.4 fold.

Treatment
treatment with both isolates togethere0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
peroxidasee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
7.4 folde0
Comparator
plants treated solely with R. solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with both isolates together greatly enhanced levels of l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL; 2.8 fold), peroxidase (POX; 7.4 fold), polyphenol oxidase (PPO; 4.5 fold), and total phenol (8.5 fold) compared with plants treated solely with R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined isolates increased polyphenol oxidase level 4.5 fold.

Treatment
treatment with both isolates togethere0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
4.5 folde0
Comparator
plants treated solely with R. solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with both isolates together greatly enhanced levels of l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL; 2.8 fold), peroxidase (POX; 7.4 fold), polyphenol oxidase (PPO; 4.5 fold), and total phenol (8.5 fold) compared with plants treated solely with R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined isolates increased total phenol level 8.5 fold.

Treatment
treatment with both isolates togethere0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
total phenole0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.5 folde0
Comparator
plants treated solely with R. solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with both isolates together greatly enhanced levels of l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL; 2.8 fold), peroxidase (POX; 7.4 fold), polyphenol oxidase (PPO; 4.5 fold), and total phenol (8.5 fold) compared with plants treated solely with R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyclo-(Pro-Leu) and cyclo-(Pro-Phe) were identified as major components responsible for antifungal properties and induced resistance.

Compound
cyclo-(Pro-Leu) and cyclo-(Pro-Phe)e0
Outcome
antifungal properties of the two isolates and their capacity to trigger ISR in plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cyclo-(Pro-Leu) and cyclo-(Pro-Phe) were the major components responsible for the antifungal properties of the two isolates and their capacity to trigger ISR in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia solani · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Rhizoctonia solani · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 106 positive, 52 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.