Paper · 1985 · Korean journal of applied entomology

Relationship between Planthoppers ( Nilaparvata lugens and Sogatella furcifera ) and Rice Diseases

S. C. Lee; D.M. Matias; T. W. Mew; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The locational preference of the brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens () and the whitebacked plant hopper (WBPH) Sogatella furcifera(Horvath) was studied on rice cultivars IR22 and IR36 as an integral part of subsequent research on insect-fungal pathogen relationships. The BPH was observed to stay consistently on the basal portion while the WBPH showed a general preference for the upper portion regardless of varieties, rice growth stages and insect population density levels. The habitat preference of both species (BPH and WBPH) was found not to be affected by the presence of the other species when both species are present on the same host plant Five rice cultivars with different reactions to BPH biotype 2 were used in the study on BPH-Rhizoctonia solani relationship: IR22 and TN1 (susceptible); Triveni and ASD7 (moderately resistant); and IR42 (resistant). Test plants were inoculated with R. solani (Kuhn) days after insect infestation. Sheath blight disease severity/incidence was significantly higher in the treatment where BPH+R. solani were together than in the treatment with only the pathogen. Symptom expression of the disease in the BPH-pathogen combination was faster and mycelial growth was more profuse inducing the formation of more infection structures. Regardless of varietal reaction to BPH biotype 2, the degree of hopperburn was significantly higher in the combination of the two pests as compared with that of BPH alone. There could be a synergistic relationship between the insect pest and the pathogen indicated by a positive interaction between the two species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown planthopper stayed consistently on the basal portion of rice plants.

Organ / stage
basal portione1
Interactor
BPHe1pest
Outcome
stay consistently on the basal portione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BPH was observed to stay consistently on the basal portion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitebacked planthopper generally preferred the upper portion of rice plants regardless of variety, growth stage and population density.

Organ / stage
upper portione1
Interactor
WBPHe1pest
Outcome
general preference for the upper portione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“the WBPH showed a general preference for the upper portion regardless of varieties, rice growth stages and insect population density levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–484 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The habitat preference of BPH and WBPH was not affected by the presence of the other species on the same host plant.

Interactor
BPHe1pest
Second interactor
WBPHe1pest
Outcome
habitat preferencee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The habitat preference of both species (BPH and WBPH) was found not to be affected by the presence of the other species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheath blight severity/incidence was significantly higher with BPH and R. solani together than with the pathogen alone.

Treatment
BPH+R. solanie1
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
BPHe1pest
Outcome
Sheath blight disease severity/incidencee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
only the pathogene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sheath blight disease severity/incidence was significantly higher in the treatment where BPH+R. solani were together than in the treatment with only the pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease symptom expression was faster in the BPH-pathogen combination.

Treatment
BPH-pathogen combinatione1
Interactor
pathogene1pathogen
Second interactor
BPHe1pest
Outcome
Symptom expression of the diseasee1
Direction
fastere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Symptom expression of the disease in the BPH-pathogen combination was faster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycelial growth of the pathogen was more profuse in the BPH-pathogen combination.

Treatment
BPH-pathogen combinatione1
Interactor
pathogene1pathogen
Second interactor
BPHe1pest
Outcome
mycelial growthe1
Direction
more profusee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Symptom expression of the disease in the BPH-pathogen combination was faster and mycelial growth was more profuse inducing the formation of more infection structures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hopperburn was significantly higher with BPH and the pathogen combined than with BPH alone, regardless of varietal reaction to BPH biotype 2.

Treatment
combination of the two pestse1
Interactor
BPHe1pest
Outcome
degree of hopperburne1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
Regardless of varietal reaction to BPH biotype 2e1
Comparator
BPH alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of varietal reaction to BPH biotype 2, the degree of hopperburn was significantly higher in the combination of the two pests as compared with that of BPH alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1456 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest a synergistic relationship between the insect pest and the pathogen, indicated by a positive interaction.

Outcome
synergistic relationship between the insect pest and the pathogene1
Qualifier
positive interaction between the two speciese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“There could be a synergistic relationship between the insect pest and the pathogen indicated by a positive interaction between the two species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1600 · show in text ↑

Nilaparvata lugens · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Rhizoctonia solani · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.