Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

Impacts of aquaculture wastewater irrigation on soil health, nutrient availability, and date palm fruit quality

Mohammad I. Al-Wabel; Mohammad M. Almutari; Munir Ahmad; et al.

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Water scarcity and droughts are among the most challenging issues worldwide, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions like Saudi Arabia. Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.), a major crop in Saudi Arabia, is being significantly affected by water scarcity, soil salinity, and desertification. Alternative water sources are needed to conserve freshwater resources and increase date palm production in Saudi Arabia. On the other hand, Saudi Arabia has a significant number of aquaculture farms that generate substantial amounts of wastewater, which can be utilized as an alternative source of irrigation. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the potential of aquaculture wastewater as an alternative irrigation source for date palm orchards. Aquaculture wastewater was collected from 12 different farms (Al-Kharj, Al-Muzahmiya, and Al-Qassim regions, Saudi Arabia) and its quality was analyzed. The impacts of aquaculture wastewater irrigation on soil quality, nutrient availability, nutrient status of date palm trees, and dates fruit quality were assessed in comparison to source water (freshwater) irrigation at Al-Kharj, Al-Muzahmiya, and Al-Qassim regions. The water quality analyses showed higher salinity (EC = 3.31 dSm −1 ) in farm Q3, while all other farms demonstrated no salinity, sodicity, or alkalinity hazards. Moreover, the aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available P, K, NO 3 − –N, and NH 4 + –N by 49.31%, 21.11%, 33.62%, and 52.31%, respectively, compared to source water irrigation. On average, date palm fruit weight, length, and moisture contents increased by 26%, 23%, and 43% under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation. Further, P, K, Fe, Cu, and Zn contents in date palm leaf were increased by 19.35%, 34.17%, 37.36%, 38.24%, and 45.29%, respectively, under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation. Overall, aquaculture wastewater irrigation significantly enhanced date palm plant growth, date palm fruit quality, and soil available nutrients compared to freshwater irrigation. It was concluded that aquaculture wastewater can be used as an effective irrigation source for date palm farms as it enhances soil nutrient availability, date palm growth, and date fruit yield and quality. The findings of this study suggest that aquaculture wastewater could be a viable alternative for conserving freshwater resources and increase date palm production in Saudi Arabia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available phosphorus by 49.31% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
soil availablee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
49.31%e1
Qualifier
Pe1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available P, K, NO 3 − –N, and NH 4 + –N by 49.31%, 21.11%, 33.62%, and 52.31%, respectively, compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1516 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available potassium by 21.11% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
soil availablee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.11%e1
Qualifier
Ke1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available P, K, NO 3 − –N, and NH 4 + –N by 49.31%, 21.11%, 33.62%, and 52.31%, respectively, compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1516 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available nitrate nitrogen by 33.62% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
soil availablee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
33.62%e1
Qualifier
NO 3 − –Ne1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available P, K, NO 3 − –N, and NH 4 + –N by 49.31%, 21.11%, 33.62%, and 52.31%, respectively, compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1516 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available ammonium nitrogen by 52.31% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
soil availablee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
52.31%e1
Qualifier
NH 4 + –Ne1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased soil available P, K, NO 3 − –N, and NH 4 + –N by 49.31%, 21.11%, 33.62%, and 52.31%, respectively, compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1516 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased date palm fruit weight by 26% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
fruite1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
fruit weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26%e1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“On average, date palm fruit weight, length, and moisture contents increased by 26%, 23%, and 43% under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1690 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased date palm fruit length by 23% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
fruite1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
23%e1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“On average, date palm fruit weight, length, and moisture contents increased by 26%, 23%, and 43% under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1690 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased date palm fruit moisture content by 43% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
fruite1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
moisture contentse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
43%e1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“On average, date palm fruit weight, length, and moisture contents increased by 26%, 23%, and 43% under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1690 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased leaf phosphorus content of date palm by 19.35% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
contentse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
19.35%e1
Qualifier
Pe1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“P, K, Fe, Cu, and Zn contents in date palm leaf were increased by 19.35%, 34.17%, 37.36%, 38.24%, and 45.29%, respectively, under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1900 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased leaf potassium content of date palm by 34.17% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
contentse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
34.17%e1
Qualifier
Ke1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“P, K, Fe, Cu, and Zn contents in date palm leaf were increased by 19.35%, 34.17%, 37.36%, 38.24%, and 45.29%, respectively, under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1900 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased leaf iron content of date palm by 37.36% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
contentse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
37.36%e1
Qualifier
Fee1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“P, K, Fe, Cu, and Zn contents in date palm leaf were increased by 19.35%, 34.17%, 37.36%, 38.24%, and 45.29%, respectively, under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1900 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased leaf copper content of date palm by 38.24% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
contentse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
38.24%e1
Qualifier
Cue1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“P, K, Fe, Cu, and Zn contents in date palm leaf were increased by 19.35%, 34.17%, 37.36%, 38.24%, and 45.29%, respectively, under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1900 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation increased leaf zinc content of date palm by 45.29% relative to source water irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
contentse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
45.29%e1
Qualifier
Zne1
Comparator
source water irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“P, K, Fe, Cu, and Zn contents in date palm leaf were increased by 19.35%, 34.17%, 37.36%, 38.24%, and 45.29%, respectively, under aquaculture wastewater irrigation compared to source water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1900 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater irrigation significantly enhanced date palm plant growth, fruit quality and soil available nutrients relative to freshwater irrigation.

Taxon
Date palmPhoenix dactyliferae2
Treatment
aquaculture wastewater irrigatione1
Outcome
plant growth, date palm fruit quality, and soil available nutrientse1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
freshwater irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Overall, aquaculture wastewater irrigation significantly enhanced date palm plant growth, date palm fruit quality, and soil available nutrients compared to freshwater irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1902–2079 · show in text ↑
e2

“Date palm ( Phoenix dactylifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm Q3 wastewater showed higher salinity (EC 3.31 dS/m) than the other farms.

Outcome
salinitye1
Value
EC = 3.31 dSm −1e1
Setting
farm Q3e1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“The water quality analyses showed higher salinity (EC = 3.31 dSm −1 ) in farm Q3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1241 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All other farms wastewater showed no salinity, sodicity or alkalinity hazards.

Outcome
salinity, sodicity, or alkalinity hazardse1
Qualifier
all other farmse1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“while all other farms demonstrated no salinity, sodicity, or alkalinity hazards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1322 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Aquaculture wastewater can be used as an effective irrigation source for date palm farms.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Outcome
effective irrigation sourcee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“aquaculture wastewater can be used as an effective irrigation source for date palm farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2191 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · yield · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.