Paper · 2024 · Karantin i zahist roslin

Effectiveness of bioinsecticides for different applications against the main pests of radish

S. Shchetina; I. Mostoviak; V. Fedorenko

20
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Goal. To determine the technical effectiveness of bioinsecticides against major insect pests of radish (Raphanus sativus (L.) convar. radicula (Pers) Sazon.) grown in open fields, and their impact on plants, yield, and root crop quality. Methods. The study was conducted in accordance with the methods generally accepted in entomology and vegetable growing. During 2020—2022 in open ground conditions on three radish hybrids of different ripeness groups (Adele, Eliza and Stellar) the effectiveness of bioinsecticides Bitoxibacillin-BTU, p. (cell bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis-endospores, titer 1.0 × 10⁹ CFU/ cm3, CS +), 2 l/ha, ACTOVERM FORMULA, CE (abamectin, 18 g/l), 5 l/ha, Lepidocide-BTU, p. (cells of the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis-var. Kurstaki 9708 L, endospores less than 1 × 109 CFU/cm3), 4 l/ ha, (control). The preparations were applied by spraying plants and fertigation (introduction of fertilizers or pesticides into the irrigation system). Results. On the 14th day after spraying radish plants with Bitoxybacillin-BTU, the population of crucifer flea beetles decreased by 3.9—5.2 times and by 2.8—3.9 times with fertigation. The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 3.9—4.8 and 3.0—3.5 times, and cabbage moth by 5.0—9.0 and 2.7—5.0 times, respectively. The technical effectiveness of Bitoxybacillin-BTU was 76% and 68% against crucifer flea beetles, 78% and 70% against cabbage aphids, and 83% and 73% against cabbage moth. The application of ACTOVERM FORMULA by spraying reduced the population of crucifer flea beetles by 2.6—3.3 times and by 2.5—2.7 times with fertigation. The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 2.9—3.6 and 2.5—2.8 times, and cabbage moth by 2.0—3.0 and 2.0—5.0 times, depending on the radish hybrid. The technical effectiveness of ACTOVERM FORMULA against these pests was 67%, 70%, and 77% with spraying, and 60%, 62%, and 73% with fertigation, respectively. No negative effects from spraying or fertigation with bioinsecticides on radish plants were detected. However, radish plants in the spray treatment had higher height (by 2—3 cm), more leaves per plant (by 1 leaf), and a larger leaf surface area (by 0.2—0.8 thousand m²/ha), depending on the hybrid and product. The root mass increased in treatments with double spraying of ACTOVERM FORMULA and Bitoxybacillin-BTU compared to control and fertigation. The use of bioinsecticides Bitoxybacillin- BTU and ACTOVERM FORMULA (2 treatments) during vegetation ensured yields of 25.6—25.8 t/ha for the Adele hybrid with 93—94% marketable root crops, 24.0—25.1 t/ha for the Eliza hybrid with 94—95% marketable root crops, and 23.2—23.7 t/ha for the Stellar hybrid with 95—96% marketable root crops. The root crops had high dry matter content (Adele: 7.9—8.2%, Eliza: 6.2—6.3%, Stellar: 6.5—6.7%), total sugars (Adele: 2.4—2.5%, Eliza: 2.1—2.2%, Stellar: 2.6%), and ascorbic acid content (Adele: 26.0—26.2 mg/100 g, Eliza: 23.9—24.0 mg/100 g, Stellar: 25.4—25.5 mg/100 g). Conclusions. The application of bioinsecticides Bitoxybacillin-BTU (2 l/ha) and ACTOVERM FORMULA (5 l/ ha) is an effective method for controlling sucking pests in radish crops. Double spraying of radish plants at BBCH 0—9 and BBCH 12—19 with Bitoxybacillin-BTU (2 l/ha) provided control of crucifer flea beetle (76%), cabbage aphid (78%), and cabbage moth (83%). Double spraying with ACTOVERM FORMULA (5 l/ha) at the same stages provided control of crucifer flea beetle (67%), cabbage aphid (70%), and cabbage moth (77%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitoxybacillin-BTU spraying reduced crucifer flea beetles 3.9—5.2 times.

Treatment
spraying radish plants with Bitoxybacillin-BTUe0
Interactor
crucifer flea beetlese0pest
Outcome
population of crucifer flea beetlese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.9—5.2 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the 14th day after spraying radish plants with Bitoxybacillin-BTU, the population of crucifer flea beetles decreased by 3.9—5.2 times and by 2.8—3.9 times with fertigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitoxybacillin-BTU fertigation reduced crucifer flea beetles 2.8—3.9 times.

Treatment
fertigatione0
Interactor
crucifer flea beetlese0pest
Outcome
population of crucifer flea beetlese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.8—3.9 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the population of crucifer flea beetles decreased by 3.9—5.2 times and by 2.8—3.9 times with fertigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitoxybacillin-BTU reduced cabbage aphids 3.9—4.8 times with spraying.

Interactor
cabbage aphidsBrevicoryne brassicaee0pest
Outcome
population of cabbage aphidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.9—4.8e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brevicoryne brassicae
Brevicoryne brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 3.9—4.8 and 3.0—3.5 times, and cabbage moth by 5.0—9.0 and 2.7—5.0 times, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitoxybacillin-BTU reduced cabbage aphids 3.0—3.5 times with fertigation.

Interactor
cabbage aphidsBrevicoryne brassicaee0pest
Outcome
population of cabbage aphidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.0—3.5 timese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brevicoryne brassicae
Brevicoryne brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 3.9—4.8 and 3.0—3.5 times, and cabbage moth by 5.0—9.0 and 2.7—5.0 times, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitoxybacillin-BTU reduced cabbage moths 5.0—9.0 times with spraying.

Interactor
cabbage mothe0pest
Outcome
cabbage mothe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.0—9.0e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 3.9—4.8 and 3.0—3.5 times, and cabbage moth by 5.0—9.0 and 2.7—5.0 times, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitoxybacillin-BTU reduced cabbage moths 2.7—5.0 times with fertigation.

Interactor
cabbage mothe0pest
Outcome
cabbage mothe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.7—5.0 timese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 3.9—4.8 and 3.0—3.5 times, and cabbage moth by 5.0—9.0 and 2.7—5.0 times, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACTOVERM spraying reduced crucifer flea beetles 2.6—3.3 times.

Treatment
ACTOVERM FORMULA by sprayinge0
Interactor
crucifer flea beetlese0pest
Outcome
population of crucifer flea beetlese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.6—3.3 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of ACTOVERM FORMULA by spraying reduced the population of crucifer flea beetles by 2.6—3.3 times and by 2.5—2.7 times with fertigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACTOVERM fertigation reduced crucifer flea beetles 2.5—2.7 times.

Treatment
fertigatione0
Interactor
crucifer flea beetlese0pest
Outcome
population of crucifer flea beetlese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.5—2.7 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of ACTOVERM FORMULA by spraying reduced the population of crucifer flea beetles by 2.6—3.3 times and by 2.5—2.7 times with fertigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACTOVERM reduced cabbage aphids 2.9—3.6 times with spraying.

Interactor
cabbage aphidsBrevicoryne brassicaee0pest
Outcome
population of cabbage aphidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.9—3.6e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brevicoryne brassicae
Brevicoryne brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 2.9—3.6 and 2.5—2.8 times, and cabbage moth by 2.0—3.0 and 2.0—5.0 times, depending on the radish hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACTOVERM reduced cabbage aphids 2.5—2.8 times with fertigation.

Interactor
cabbage aphidsBrevicoryne brassicaee0pest
Outcome
population of cabbage aphidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.5—2.8 timese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brevicoryne brassicae
Brevicoryne brassicae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 2.9—3.6 and 2.5—2.8 times, and cabbage moth by 2.0—3.0 and 2.0—5.0 times, depending on the radish hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACTOVERM reduced cabbage moths 2.0—3.0 times with spraying.

Interactor
cabbage mothe0pest
Outcome
cabbage mothe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.0—3.0e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 2.9—3.6 and 2.5—2.8 times, and cabbage moth by 2.0—3.0 and 2.0—5.0 times, depending on the radish hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACTOVERM reduced cabbage moths 2.0—5.0 times with fertigation.

Interactor
cabbage mothe0pest
Outcome
cabbage mothe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.0—5.0 timese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population of cabbage aphids decreased by 2.9—3.6 and 2.5—2.8 times, and cabbage moth by 2.0—3.0 and 2.0—5.0 times, depending on the radish hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1759 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinsecticides had no detected negative effects on radish plants.

Outcome
No negative effectse0
Direction
No negative effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No negative effects from spraying or fertigation with bioinsecticides on radish plants were detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–2020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying increased radish height by 2—3 cm.

Treatment
spray treatmente0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
2—3 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants in the spray treatment had higher height (by 2—3 cm), more leaves per plant (by 1 leaf), and a larger leaf surface area (by 0.2—0.8 thousand m²/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying increased radish leaves per plant by one.

Treatment
spray treatmente0
Outcome
leaves per plante0
Direction
moree0
Value
1 leafe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants in the spray treatment had higher height (by 2—3 cm), more leaves per plant (by 1 leaf), and a larger leaf surface area (by 0.2—0.8 thousand m²/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying increased radish leaf surface area by 0.2—0.8 thousand m²/ha.

Treatment
spray treatmente0
Outcome
leaf surface areae0
Direction
largere0
Value
0.2—0.8 thousand m²/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants in the spray treatment had higher height (by 2—3 cm), more leaves per plant (by 1 leaf), and a larger leaf surface area (by 0.2—0.8 thousand m²/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double spraying increased root mass relative to control and fertigation.

Treatment
double spraying of ACTOVERM FORMULA and Bitoxybacillin-BTUe0
Outcome
root masse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and fertigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root mass increased in treatments with double spraying of ACTOVERM FORMULA and Bitoxybacillin-BTU compared to control and fertigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2230–2368 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adele bioinsecticide treatments yielded 25.6—25.8 t/ha with 93—94% marketable roots.

Material
Adelee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
25.6—25.8 t/hae0
Qualifier
93—94% marketable root cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ensured yields of 25.6—25.8 t/ha for the Adele hybrid with 93—94% marketable root crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2470–2557 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eliza bioinsecticide treatments yielded 24.0—25.1 t/ha with 94—95% marketable roots.

Material
Elizae0
Outcome
marketable root cropse0
Value
24.0—25.1 t/hae0
Qualifier
94—95% marketable root cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24.0—25.1 t/ha for the Eliza hybrid with 94—95% marketable root crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2559–2628 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stellar bioinsecticide treatments yielded 23.2—23.7 t/ha with 95—96% marketable roots.

Material
Stellare0
Outcome
marketable root cropse0
Value
23.2—23.7 t/hae0
Qualifier
95—96% marketable root cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“23.2—23.7 t/ha for the Stellar hybrid with 95—96% marketable root crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2634–2705 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · pest · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.