Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

Straw incorporation and nitrogen fertilization regulate soil quality, enzyme activities and maize crop productivity in dual maize cropping system

Li Yang; Teng Yan Chen; Zhong Yi Li; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Straw incorporation serves as an effective strategy to enhance soil fertility and soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC), which in turn improves maize yield and agricultural sustainability. However, our understanding of nitrogen (N) fertilization and straw incorporation into soil microenvironment is still evolving. This study explored the impact of six N fertilization rates (N0, N100, N150, N200, N250, and N300) with and without straw incorporation on soil fertility, SMBC, enzyme activities, and maize yield. RESULTS: Results showed that both straw management and N fertilization significantly affected soil organic carbon (SOC), total N, SMBC, soil enzyme activities, and maize yield. Specifically, the N250 treatment combined with straw incorporation significantly increased SOC, total N, and SMBC compared to lower fertilization rates. Additionally, enzyme activities such as urease, cellulase, sucrose, catalase, and acid phosphatase reached their peak during the V6 growth stage in the N200 treatment under for both straw management conditions. Compared to N250 and N300 treatments of traditional planting, the N200 treatment with residue incorporation significantly increased yield by 8.30 and 4.22%, respectively. All measured parameters, except for cellulase activity, were significantly higher in spring than in the autumn across both study years, with notable increases observed in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that optimal levels of SOC, soil total N (STN), and SMBC, along with increased soil enzyme activities, is crucial for sustaining soil fertility and enhancing maize grain yield under straw incorporation and N200 treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The N250 treatment with straw incorporation significantly increased soil organic carbon, total N and microbial biomass carbon compared with lower fertilization rates.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N250 treatment combined with straw incorporatione1
Outcome
SOC, total N, and SMBCe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
lower fertilization ratese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Specifically, the N250 treatment combined with straw incorporation significantly increased SOC, total N, and SMBC compared to lower fertilization rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The N200 treatment with residue incorporation significantly increased maize yield by 8.30% compared with the N250 treatment of traditional planting.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N200 treatment with residue incorporatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
8.30e2
Comparator
N250 and N300 treatments of traditional plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to N250 and N300 treatments of traditional planting, the N200 treatment with residue incorporation significantly increased yield by 8.30 and 4.22%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The N200 treatment with residue incorporation significantly increased maize yield by 4.22% compared with the N300 treatment of traditional planting.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N200 treatment with residue incorporatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.22%e2
Comparator
N300 treatments of traditional plantinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to N250 and N300 treatments of traditional planting, the N200 treatment with residue incorporation significantly increased yield by 8.30 and 4.22%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil enzyme activities such as urease, cellulase, sucrose, catalase and acid phosphatase peaked at the V6 growth stage under N200.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
V6 growth stagee3
Treatment
N200e3
Outcome
enzyme activitiese3
Direction
reached their peake3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“enzyme activities such as urease, cellulase, sucrose, catalase, and acid phosphatase reached their peak during the V6 growth stage in the N200 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1020 · show in text ↑

organic · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 73 positive, 5 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.