Paper · 2024 · Microbial Ecology

Molecular Characterization Reveals Biodiversity and Biopotential of Rhizobacterial Isolates of Bacillus Spp

Alka Sagar; Shalini Rai; Sonia Sharma; et al.

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bacillus species appearas the most attractive plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and alternative to synthetic chemical pesticides. The present study examined the antagonistic potential of spore forming-Bacilli isolated from organic farm soil samples of Allahabad, India. Eighty-seven Bacillus strains were isolated and characterized based on their morphological, plant growth promoting traits and molecular characteristics. The diversity analysis used 16S-rDNA, BOX-element, and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus. Two strains, PR30 and PR32, later identified as Bacillus sp., exhibited potent in vitro antagonistic activity against Ralstonia solanaceorum. These isolates produced copious amounts of multiple PGP traits, such as indole-3-acetic acid (40.0 and 54.5 μg/mL), phosphate solubilization index (PSI) (4.4 and 5.3), ammonia, siderophore (3 and 4 cm), and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (8.1and 9.2 μM/mg//h) and hydrogen cyanide. These isolates were subjected to the antibiotic sensitivity test. The two potent isolates based on the higher antagonistic and the best plant growth-promoting ability were selected for plant growth-promoting response studies in tomatoe, broccoli, and chickpea. In the pot study, Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31) showed significant improvement in seed germination (27-34%), root length (20-50%), shoot length (20-40%), vigor index (50-75%), carotenoid content (0.543-1.733), and lycopene content (2.333-2.646 mg/100 g) in tomato, broccoli, and chickpea. The present study demonstrated the production of multiple plant growth-promoting traits by the isolates and their potential as effective bioinoculants for plant growth promotion and biocontrol of phytopathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Bacillus strains, PR30 and PR32, showed potent in vitro antagonistic activity against Ralstonia solanaceorum.

Taxon
Bacillus sp.e0
Material
PR30 and PR32e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanaceorume0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus sp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic activitye0
Setting
in vitroe0

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus Spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two strains, PR30 and PR32, later identified as Bacillus sp., exhibited potent in vitro antagonistic activity against Ralstonia solanaceorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Bacillus isolates produced indole-3-acetic acid with values 40.0 and 54.5 μg/mL.

Taxon
Bacillus Sppt0
Outcome
indole-3-acetic acide0
Value
40.0 and 54.5 μg/mLe0

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus Spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“indole-3-acetic acid (40.0 and 54.5 μg/mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Bacillus isolates produced phosphate solubilization index (PSI) with values 4.4 and 5.3.

Taxon
Bacillus Sppt0
Outcome
phosphate solubilization index (PSI)e0
Value
4.4 and 5.3e0

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus Spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“phosphate solubilization index (PSI) (4.4 and 5.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Bacillus isolates produced siderophore with values 3 and 4 cm.

Taxon
Bacillus Sppt0
Outcome
siderophoree0
Value
3 and 4 cme0

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus Spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“siderophore (3 and 4 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Bacillus isolates produced 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase with values 8.1and 9.2 μM/mg//h.

Taxon
Bacillus Sppt0
Outcome
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminasee0
Value
8.1and 9.2 μM/mg//he0

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus Spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (8.1and 9.2 μM/mg//h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–951 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolates also produced ammonia and hydrogen cyanide among multiple plant growth-promoting traits.

Taxon
Bacillus Sppt0
Outcome
multiple PGP traitse0

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus Spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“These isolates produced copious amounts of multiple PGP traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis significantly improved seed germination by 27-34% in tomato, broccoli and chickpea.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)e2
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2symbiont
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
27-34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31) showed significant improvement in seed germination (27-34%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1346 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, broccoli, and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis increased root length by 20-50% in tomato, broccoli and chickpea.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)e2
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
20-50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (20-50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1368 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, broccoli, and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis increased shoot length by 20-40% in tomato, broccoli and chickpea.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)e2
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
20-40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot length (20-40%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1391 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, broccoli, and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis increased vigor index by 50-75% in tomato, broccoli and chickpea.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)e2
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2symbiont
Outcome
vigor indexe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
50-75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vigor index (50-75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, broccoli, and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis increased carotenoid content (0.543-1.733) in tomato, broccoli and chickpea.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)e2
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2symbiont
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.543-1.733e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carotenoid content (0.543-1.733)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1447 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, broccoli, and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis increased lycopene content (2.333-2.646 mg/100 g) in tomato, broccoli and chickpea.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)e2
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise2symbiont
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
2.333-2.646 mg/100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lycopene content (2.333-2.646 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1492 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato, broccoli, and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus subtilis (PR30 and PR31)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1286 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.