Paper · 2022 · Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology

Evaluation of the Efficacy of some Bioagents accompanied with Bio- and Mineral Fertilizers in Controlling Early Blight of Tomato and Improvement Yield

Madian Mergawy; Howida Metwaly; Abeer Shoeip

5
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) early blight caused by Alternaria solani is one of the most destructive diseases that reduce tomato production worldwide. The effect of organic manure, biofertilizer (N2-fixer’s bacteria) as Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum lipoferum and the bioagents Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus subtilis in controlling early blight of tomato cultivar 935 was evaluated under greenhouse and field conditions during the two successive growing seasons 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 at Abshway county, Fayoum governorate, Egypt. Adding biofertiizer and spraying tomato plants with bioagents or the fungicide Oxyplus (copper oxychloride) reduced the disease incidence and disease severity better than using the mineral fertilizer and spraying with bioagents or Oxyplus in both greenhouse and field experiments. T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizer significantly increased the activities of defense-related enzymes i.e., catalase, polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase and the total content of phenols under greenhouse conditions. As well as, this treatment increased plant height, number of branches, chlorophyll content, plants NPK content, number of fruits/ plant and total yield under the field conditions compared to chemical fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biofertilizer and spraying tomato plants with bioagents or the fungicide Oxyplus reduced early blight incidence and severity more than mineral fertilizer with bioagents or Oxyplus, in greenhouse and field.

Treatment
Adding biofertiizer and spraying tomato plants with bioagents or the fungicide Oxypluse0
Interactor
Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanie1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence and disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the mineral fertilizer and spraying with bioagents or Oxypluse0
Setting
greenhouse and field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding biofertiizer and spraying tomato plants with bioagents or the fungicide Oxyplus (copper oxychloride) reduced the disease incidence and disease severity better than using the mineral fertilizer and spraying with bioagents or Oxyplus in both greenhouse and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Alternaria solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, T. harzianum plus B. subtilis with biofertilizer significantly increased the activities of the defence-related enzymes catalase, polyphenoloxidase and peroxidase in tomato.

Treatment
T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizere0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activities of defense-related enzymes i.e., catalase, polyphenoloxidase, peroxidasee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizer significantly increased the activities of defense-related enzymes i.e., catalase, polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–997 · show in text ↑
e1

“under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1058 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, T. harzianum plus B. subtilis with biofertilizer significantly increased the total phenol content of tomato.

Treatment
T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizere0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
total content of phenolse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizer significantly increased the activities of defense-related enzymes i.e., catalase, polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase and the total content of phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1030 · show in text ↑
e1

“under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1058 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, T. harzianum plus B. subtilis with biofertilizer increased tomato plant height, number of branches and chlorophyll content compared with chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizere0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height, number of branches, chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
chemical fertilizere2
Setting
field conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height, number of branches, chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1150 · show in text ↑
e2

“under the field conditions compared to chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1270 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field, T. harzianum plus B. subtilis with biofertilizer increased tomato plant NPK content, number of fruits per plant and total yield compared with chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizere0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plants NPK content, number of fruits/ plant and total yielde2
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
chemical fertilizere3
Setting
field conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum + B. subtilis with biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1109 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants NPK content, number of fruits/ plant and total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1211 · show in text ↑
e3

“under the field conditions compared to chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1270 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.