Paper · 2024 · Plant Stress

Elevated CO2 improves grain yield in bread wheat by enhancing carbon assimilation, activities of carbohydrate metabolic and antixidant enzymes

Aneela Ulfat; Sajid Shokat; Fulai Liu

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of elevated CO2 (e[CO2]) on wheat performance under drought stress, while investigating the role of eco-physiology, carbohydrate metabolic and antioxidant enzymes to predict the grain yield. Wheat genotype Lianmai6 was grown under ambient (400ppm) and elevated (800ppm) CO2 concentrations, with subsequent exposure to drought stress prior to anthesis. Leaf parameters, including photosynthetic rate (An), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (E), were significantly declined under drought. Grain yield parameters were adversely affected by drought stress, while An and water use efficiency (WUE) and yield traits increased under e[CO2]. Notably, the activities of certain carbohydrate metabolic enzymes were increased in sink tissues but reduced significantly in source tissues under drought conditions. However, activities phosphoglucomutase (PGM and phophoglucoisomerase (PGI) were increased in source tissues under the combined effect of drought and e[CO2]. Total antioxidant potential (TAP) decreased in both leaf and spike under drought conditions, yet increased significantly under e[CO2]. These findings suggest that e[CO2] can enhance CO2 assimilation by boosting antioxidant potential and facilitate increased supply of photosynthates through enhanced activities of various carbohydrate metabolic enzymes, ultimately the better grain yield. These findings could elucidate the partial mechanism of better grain yield in bread wheat under combined effect of e[CO2] and drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced wheat photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
photosynthetic rate (An), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (E)e0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf parameters, including photosynthetic rate (An), stomatal conductance (Gs), and transpiration rate (E), were significantly declined under drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–542 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought adversely affected wheat grain-yield parameters.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Grain yield parameterse0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield parameters were adversely affected by drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–607 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat photosynthetic rate and water-use efficiency.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
An and water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An and water use efficiency (WUE) and yield traits increased under e[CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat yield traits.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
yield traitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An and water use efficiency (WUE) and yield traits increased under e[CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased carbohydrate-metabolic enzyme activities in sink tissues.

Organ / stage
sink tissuese0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
activities of certain carbohydrate metabolic enzymese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of certain carbohydrate metabolic enzymes were increased in sink tissues but reduced significantly in source tissues under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced carbohydrate-metabolic enzyme activities in source tissues.

Organ / stage
source tissuese0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
activities of certain carbohydrate metabolic enzymese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of certain carbohydrate metabolic enzymes were increased in sink tissues but reduced significantly in source tissues under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drought and elevated CO2 increased PGM and PGI activities in source tissues.

Organ / stage
source tissuese0
Treatment
combined effect of drought and e[CO2]e0
Outcome
activities phosphoglucomutase (PGM and phophoglucoisomerase (PGI)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities phosphoglucomutase (PGM and phophoglucoisomerase (PGI) were increased in source tissues under the combined effect of drought and e[CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased total antioxidant potential in both wheat leaves and spikes.

Organ / stage
leaf and spikee0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
Total antioxidant potential (TAP)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total antioxidant potential (TAP) decreased in both leaf and spike under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly increased total antioxidant potential.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
Total antioxidant potential (TAP)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total antioxidant potential (TAP) decreased in both leaf and spike under drought conditions, yet increased significantly under e[CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat genotype Lianmai6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–254 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

co2 · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

42 papers: 38 positive, 4 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 8 positive, 13 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.