Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Impact of elevated CO2 on two contrasting wheat genotypes exposed to intermediate drought stress at anthesis

Sajid Shokat; Dominik K. Großkinsky; Fulai Liu

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
39
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this experiment was to investigate the responses of contrasting wheat genotypes to drought stress under ambient and elevated CO 2 environments. At anthesis, the plants from each CO 2 levels were either exposed to progressive drought or well‐watered at 95% of pot holding capacity. The results showed that for both genotypes, CO 2 elevation sensitized the plants’ response to soil drying in terms of reduction of evapotranspiration. Drought significantly reduced trans ‐zeatin (tZ) concentration in leaves, salicylic acid (SA) concentration in spikes, and physiological and yield‐related traits. However, the concentration of abscisic acid (ABA) and other phytohormones was increased under drought, which coincided with an increase in the kernel abortion. Elevated CO 2 significantly increased photosynthetic rate, but had no significant effect on yield‐related traits. Genotype L 3 possessed higher concentration of leaf tz, osmotic potential, and spike SA/ABA ratio under combined drought and elevated CO 2 as compared to genotype L 2 . L 3 also had higher thousand kernel weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison to L 2 . The results indicate that elevated CO 2 is not necessarily increasing yield, and biophysiochemical traits in L 3 could be used as valuable selecting criteria to obtain higher TKW and grain yield in future drier and CO 2 ‐enriched environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 sensitized evapotranspiration reduction during soil drying in both genotypes.

Treatment
CO 2 elevatione0
Outcome
evapotranspiratione0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
for both genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for both genotypes, CO 2 elevation sensitized the plants’ response to soil drying in terms of reduction of evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced leaf trans-zeatin.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
trans ‐zeatin (tZ) concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought significantly reduced trans ‐zeatin (tZ) concentration in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced salicylic acid in spikes.

Organ / stage
spikese0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
salicylic acid (SA) concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought significantly reduced trans ‐zeatin (tZ) concentration in leaves, salicylic acid (SA) concentration in spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced physiological and yield-related traits.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
physiological and yield‐related traitse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought significantly reduced trans ‐zeatin (tZ) concentration in leaves, salicylic acid (SA) concentration in spikes, and physiological and yield‐related traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased abscisic acid and other phytohormones.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
concentration of abscisic acid (ABA) and other phytohormonese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of abscisic acid (ABA) and other phytohormones was increased under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased phytohormones coincided with increased kernel abortion under drought.

Treatment
droughte0
Compound
abscisic acid (ABA)e0
Outcome
kernel abortione0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of abscisic acid (ABA) and other phytohormones was increased under drought, which coincided with an increase in the kernel abortion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
Elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO 2 significantly increased photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on yield-related traits.

Treatment
Elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
yield‐related traitse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO 2 significantly increased photosynthetic rate, but had no significant effect on yield‐related traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L3 had higher leaf trans-zeatin than L2 under combined drought and elevated CO2.

Material
L 3e0
Outcome
concentration of leaf tze0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under combined drought and elevated CO 2e0
Comparator
L 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype L 3 possessed higher concentration of leaf tz, osmotic potential, and spike SA/ABA ratio under combined drought and elevated CO 2 as compared to genotype L 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L3 had higher osmotic potential than L2 under combined drought and elevated CO2.

Material
L 3e0
Outcome
osmotic potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
L 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype L 3 possessed higher concentration of leaf tz, osmotic potential, and spike SA/ABA ratio under combined drought and elevated CO 2 as compared to genotype L 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L3 had a higher spike SA/ABA ratio than L2 under combined drought and elevated CO2.

Material
L 3e0
Outcome
spike SA/ABA ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
L 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype L 3 possessed higher concentration of leaf tz, osmotic potential, and spike SA/ABA ratio under combined drought and elevated CO 2 as compared to genotype L 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L3 had higher thousand kernel weight than L2.

Material
L 3e0
Outcome
thousand kernel weight (TKW)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
L 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L 3 also had higher thousand kernel weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison to L 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L3 had higher grain yield than L2.

Material
L 3e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
L 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L 3 also had higher thousand kernel weight (TKW) and grain yield in comparison to L 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

L3 biophysiochemical traits could serve as selection criteria for higher kernel weight and grain yield in future drier, CO2-enriched conditions.

Material
L 3e0
Outcome
biophysiochemical traits in L 3 could be used as valuable selecting criteria to obtain higher TKW and grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biophysiochemical traits in L 3 could be used as valuable selecting criteria to obtain higher TKW and grain yield in future drier and CO 2 ‐enriched environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: hormones · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 3 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

co2 · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

42 papers: 38 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 174 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.