Paper · 2024 · Pest Management Science

Tripartite interactions of an endophytic entomopathogenic fungus, Asian corn borer, and host maize under elevated carbon dioxide

Li Sui; Hui Zhu; Deli Wang; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Biological control of insect pests is encountering an unprecedented challenge in agricultural systems due to the ongoing rise in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) level. The use of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) in these systems is gaining increased attention, and EPF as crop endophytes hold the potential for combining insect pest control and yield enhancement of crops, but the effects of increased CO 2 concentration on this interaction are poorly understood. Here, the introduction of endophytic EPF was explored as an alternative sustainable management strategy benefiting crops under elevated CO 2 , using maize ( Zea mays ), Asian corn borer ( Ostrinia furnacalis ), and EPF ( Beauveria bassiana ) to test changes in damage to maize plants from O. furnacalis , and the nutritional status (content of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium), biomass, and yield of maize. RESULTS The results showed that endophytic B. bassiana could alleviate the damage caused by O. furnacalis larvae for maize plants under ambient CO 2 concentration, and this effect was enhanced under higher CO 2 concentration. Inoculation with B. bassiana effectively counteracted the adverse impact of elevated CO 2 on maize plants by preserving the nitrogen content at its baseline level (comparable with ambient CO 2 conditions without B. bassiana ). Both simultaneous effects could explain the improvement of biomass and yield of maize under B. bassiana inoculation and elevated CO 2 . CONCLUSION This finding provides key information about the multifaceted benefits of B. bassiana as a maize endophyte. Our results highlight the promising potential of incorporating EPF as endophytes into integrated pest management strategies, particularly under elevated CO 2 concentrations. © 2024 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic B. bassiana alleviated larval damage to maize under ambient CO2, more strongly under higher CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
endophytic B. bassianae0
Interactor
O. furnacalisOstrinia furnacalise0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
damage caused by O. furnacalis larvaee0
Direction
alleviatee0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ostrinia furnacalis
Ostrinia furnacalis · InteractorKembangraps · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“endophytic B. bassiana could alleviate the damage caused by O. furnacalis larvae for maize plants under ambient CO 2 concentration, and this effect was enhanced under higher CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana inoculation preserved maize nitrogen content at its ambient CO2 baseline under elevated CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Inoculation with B. bassianae0
Interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
preservinge0
Comparator
ambient CO 2 conditions without B. bassianae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with B. bassiana effectively counteracted the adverse impact of elevated CO 2 on maize plants by preserving the nitrogen content at its baseline level (comparable with ambient CO 2 conditions without B. bassiana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana inoculation under elevated CO2 improved maize biomass and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
B. bassiana inoculation and elevated CO 2e0
Interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0symbiont
Outcome
biomass and yielde0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improvement of biomass and yield of maize under B. bassiana inoculation and elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1472 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend endophytic EPF in integrated pest management under elevated CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
EPFe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incorporating EPF as endophytes into integrated pest management strategiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporating EPF as endophytes into integrated pest management strategies, particularly under elevated CO 2 concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“host maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · Ostrinia furnacalis · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

52 papers: 41 positive, 11 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.