Paper · 2024 · Journal of Pest Science

Indirect effects of plasma-activated water irrigation on Tetranychus urticae populations

Patrice Jacob Savi; Anil Mantri; Haleh Khodaverdi; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Plasma-activated water (PAW) is receiving increased attention as a booster of seed germination and seedling vigor, and some studies have described use of PAW to manage crop pathogens. Here, we examined physicochemical properties of two PAWs (referred to as PAW 6.0 and 9.4 min with atmospheric plasma jet) and assessed “their indirect effects” (applied as supplementary irrigation) on host suitability of tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) to two-spotted spider mites ( Tetranychus urticae Koch). Exposure of water to cold plasma significantly lowered pH and increased concentrations of H 2 O 2, NO 2 − , and NO 3 − . Supplementary PAW irrigations elicited significant increases in leaf composition of several elements (N, P, K S, Ca, and Mg), leaf reflectance, plant size, and trichome densities (except non-glandular trichomes on the adaxial surface). Preference bioassays revealed significant avoidance of settling and reduced oviposition by two-spotted spider mites on leaf discs from PAW-irrigated plants compared to those from untreated control plants. Performance bioassays showed a significant decrease in two-spotted spider mite populations on PAW-irrigated plants. Results presented in this study provide comprehensive support to the hypothesis that indirect effects of supplementary PAW irrigation significantly reduce host plant suitability to two-spotted spider mites. PAW 6.0 may be slightly better than PAW 9.4, and this difference in performance is discussed in this study. Applications of PAW as supplementary irrigation are likely highly compatible with other IPM tactics and should be considered an innovative and sustainable component in twenty-first-century pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plasma exposure lowered water pH.

Outcome
pHe0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of water to cold plasma significantly lowered pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plasma exposure raised water peroxide, nitrite and nitrate concentrations.

Outcome
concentrations of H 2 O 2, NO 2 − , and NO 3 −e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increased concentrations of H 2 O 2, NO 2 − , and NO 3 −”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW irrigation increased several leaf element concentrations.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
Supplementary PAW irrigationse0
Outcome
leaf composition of several elements (N, P, K S, Ca, and Mg)e0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplementary PAW irrigations elicited significant increases in leaf composition of several elements (N, P, K S, Ca, and Mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW irrigation increased leaf reflectance, plant size and trichome density, with an exception for adaxial non-glandular trichomes.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
Supplementary PAW irrigationse0
Outcome
leaf reflectance, plant size, and trichome densitiese0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
except non-glandular trichomes on the adaxial surfacee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplementary PAW irrigations elicited significant increases in leaf composition of several elements (N, P, K S, Ca, and Mg), leaf reflectance, plant size, and trichome densities (except non-glandular trichomes on the adaxial surface)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider mites avoided settling on leaves from PAW irrigated tomato.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
PAW-irrigated plantse0
Interactor
two-spotted spider mitese0pest
Outcome
settlinge0
Direction
avoidancee0
Comparator
untreated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant avoidance of settling and reduced oviposition by two-spotted spider mites on leaf discs from PAW-irrigated plants compared to those from untreated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1072 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider mite oviposition was lower on leaves from PAW irrigated tomato.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
PAW-irrigated plantse0
Interactor
two-spotted spider mitese0pest
Outcome
oviposition by two-spotted spider mitese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced oviposition by two-spotted spider mites on leaf discs from PAW-irrigated plants compared to those from untreated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1072 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spider mite populations decreased on PAW irrigated plants.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
PAW-irrigated plantse0
Interactor
two-spotted spider mitee0pest
Outcome
two-spotted spider mite populationse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant decrease in two-spotted spider mite populations on PAW-irrigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW 6.0 may perform slightly better than PAW 9.4.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
PAW 6.0e0
Outcome
slightly bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
PAW 9.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PAW 6.0 may be slightly better than PAW 9.4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1440 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend PAW irrigation as a pest management component.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
PAW as supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
component in twenty-first-century pest managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of PAW as supplementary irrigation are likely highly compatible with other IPM tactics and should be considered an innovative and sustainable component in twenty-first-century pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1709 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–454 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

physical treatment · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.