Paper · 2010 · Functional Plant Biology

Improved plant nitrogen nutrition contributes to higher water use efficiency in tomatoes under alternate partial root-zone irrigation

Yaosheng Wang; Fulai Liu; Mathias N. Andersen; et al.

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
143
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Comparative effects of partial root-zone irrigation (PRI) and deficit irrigation (DI) on stomatal conductance (gs), nitrogen accumulation and distribution in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plants were investigated in a split-root pot experiment. Results showed that both PRI and DI saved 25% water and led to 10.0% and 17.5% decreases in dry biomass, respectively, compared with the fully irrigated (FI) controls. Consequently, water use efficiency (WUE) was increased by 18.6% and 10.8% in the PRI and DI plants, respectively. The highest WUE in the PRI plants was associated with the highest carbon isotope composition (d13C), indicating that the improvement of WUE might have been a result of long-term optimisation of stomatal control over gas exchange. The constantly higher xylem sap ABA concentration in PRI compared with DI plants was seemingly responsible for the greater control over stomatal conductance during the treatment. At the end of the experiment, N accumulation and 15N recovery was highest in FI, intermediate in PRI and lowest in DI. In addition, PRI plants consistently allocated more N into the upper and middle leaf layers than in the FI and DI treatments. The improved N nutrition and distribution in the canopy may indicate that PRI plants have a greater photosynthetic capacity than DI plants; this is confirmed by the observed positive linear relationship between specific leaf N content and d13C. It is concluded that PRI improves N nutrition and optimises N distribution in the canopy, which might have been partly contributed to the high WUE in PRI tomato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRI saved 25% water relative to full irrigation.

Treatment
PRIe0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
fully irrigated (FI) controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both PRI and DI saved 25% water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–302 · show in text ↑
e1

“fully irrigated (FI) controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–417 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI saved 25% water relative to full irrigation.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
fully irrigated (FI) controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both PRI and DI saved 25% water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–302 · show in text ↑
e1

“fully irrigated (FI) controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–417 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRI decreased dry biomass by 10.0% versus full irrigation.

Treatment
PRIe1
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
10.0%e0
Comparator
fully irrigated (FI) controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.0% and 17.5% decreases in dry biomass, respectively, compared with the fully irrigated (FI) controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–417 · show in text ↑
e1

“both PRI and DI saved 25% water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI decreased dry biomass by 17.5% versus full irrigation.

Treatment
DIe1
Outcome
dry biomasse0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
17.5%e0
Comparator
fully irrigated (FI) controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.0% and 17.5% decreases in dry biomass, respectively, compared with the fully irrigated (FI) controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–417 · show in text ↑
e1

“both PRI and DI saved 25% water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–302 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRI increased water use efficiency by 18.6%.

Treatment
PRIe0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency (WUE) was increased by 18.6% and 10.8% in the PRI and DI plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI increased water use efficiency by 10.8%.

Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency (WUE) was increased by 18.6% and 10.8% in the PRI and DI plants, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRI had the highest WUE associated with the highest carbon isotope composition.

Treatment
PRIe0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
highest carbon isotope composition (d13C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest WUE in the PRI plants was associated with the highest carbon isotope composition (d13C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRI had consistently higher xylem sap ABA than DI.

Treatment
PRIe0
Outcome
xylem sap ABA concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constantly higher xylem sap ABA concentration in PRI compared with DI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRI xylem ABA was proposed to explain greater stomatal control.

Compound
ABAe0
Outcome
control over stomatal conductancee0
Qualifier
seemingly responsiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“constantly higher xylem sap ABA concentration in PRI compared with DI plants was seemingly responsible for the greater control over stomatal conductance during the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N accumulation was highest in FI, intermediate in PRI and lowest in DI.

Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
intermediate in PRI and lowest in DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N accumulation and 15N recovery was highest in FI, intermediate in PRI and lowest in DI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15N recovery was highest in FI, intermediate in PRI and lowest in DI.

Outcome
15N recoverye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
intermediate in PRI and lowest in DIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N accumulation and 15N recovery was highest in FI, intermediate in PRI and lowest in DI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRI allocated more N to upper and middle leaves than FI and DI.

Treatment
PRIe0
Outcome
N into the upper and middle leaf layerse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
FI and DI treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRI plants consistently allocated more N into the upper and middle leaf layers than in the FI and DI treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf N content was positively linearly related to carbon isotope composition.

Compound
d13Ce0
Outcome
specific leaf N contente0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“observed positive linear relationship between specific leaf N content and d13C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1430 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude PRI improves nitrogen nutrition and canopy distribution, possibly contributing to high WUE.

Treatment
PRIe0
Outcome
high WUEe0
Qualifier
improves N nutrition and optimises N distribution in the canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRI improves N nutrition and optimises N distribution in the canopy, which might have been partly contributed to the high WUE in PRI tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1599 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 117 positive, 30 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.