Abstract
The results of studies on the influence of zeolites of different fractions on the yield and quality of the Siberian early-ripening tomato fruits are presented. The subject of the survey is crushed zeolite from the Transcarpathian zeolite plant. It was revealed that the fractional composition of zeolites affects the timing of phenological phases in tomatoes. When planted in open ground on June 10, the age of the seedlings was 55 days. The time from planting to the beginning of flowering, on average over two years, was the shortest in the variant using zeolite fraction 1 mm (24 days) and the longest in the control (33 days). The first tomato harvest was done using a 1 mm fraction of zeolite on the 46th planting day. On average, mass harvest in variants with the addition of different types of zeolites occurred faster by seven days compared to the control. Standardity in all variants, including the control, was at a high level and ranged from 97.9 in the control to 98.9% in the variant, with the addition of zeolite fraction 1.5 mm during the period of mass fruiting and from 84.9 in the control to 98.0 % in the variant with the addition of zeolite fraction 1.5 mm when calculating the total yield. It has been proven that using zeolite substrates of the 1–1.5 mm fraction as a component for growing tomato plants in open ground on leached chernozem of the Northern Trans-Urals is an effective method. When zeolites of fractions 1 and 1.5 mm were included in the soil, the yield increased compared to the control by 3.5 and 3.9 kg per 1 m2, respectively. The average fruit weight was within the general requirements for the standard for this variety. However, within the variants, it ranged from 84 g in control to 141.5 g in the variant, adding a zeolite fraction of 1.5 mm. The addition of zeolite, especially the more significant fraction, smoothed out the lack of moisture, especially in 2021. In the variants with the addition of zeolites, the fruits were more important than the control by more than 1.5 times. There is a clear trend towards an increase in the dry matter content, including the number of sugars, in fruits and a decrease in the nitrate content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm zeolite fraction shortened time to flowering to 24 days versus 33 days in control.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- zeolite fraction 1 mme0
- Outcome
- time from planting to the beginning of floweringe1
- Direction
- shorteste0
- Value
- 24 dayse0
- Qualifier
- 33 dayse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the shortest in the variant using zeolite fraction 1 mm (24 days) and the longest in the control (33 days)”
t0“tomatoes”
e1“The time from planting to the beginning of flowering”
Claim · model-written summary
The first harvest with 1 mm zeolite occurred on planting day 46.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- 1 mm fraction of zeolitee0
- Outcome
- first tomato harveste0
- Value
- 46th planting daye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The first tomato harvest was done using a 1 mm fraction of zeolite on the 46th planting day”
t0“tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite treatments advanced mass harvest by seven days relative to control.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- addition of different types of zeolitese0
- Outcome
- mass harveste0
- Direction
- fastere0
- Value
- seven dayse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mass harvest in variants with the addition of different types of zeolites occurred faster by seven days compared to the control”
t0“tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Standardity during mass fruiting was 98.9% with 1.5 mm zeolite versus 97.9 in control.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- addition of zeolite fraction 1.5 mme0
- Outcome
- Standarditye1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 98.9%e0
- Qualifier
- 97.9e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ranged from 97.9 in the control to 98.9% in the variant, with the addition of zeolite fraction 1.5 mm during the period of mass fruiting”
t0“tomatoes”
e1“Standardity in all variants”
Claim · model-written summary
Total-yield standardity was 98.0% with 1.5 mm zeolite versus 84.9 in control.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- addition of zeolite fraction 1.5 mme0
- Outcome
- Standarditye1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 98.0 %e0
- Qualifier
- 84.9e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“from 84.9 in the control to 98.0 % in the variant with the addition of zeolite fraction 1.5 mm when calculating the total yield”
t0“tomatoes”
e1“Standardity in all variants”
Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm zeolite fraction increased yield by 3.5 kg per 1 m2.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fractions 1e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.5e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When zeolites of fractions 1 and 1.5 mm were included in the soil, the yield increased compared to the control by 3.5 and 3.9 kg per 1 m2, respectively”
t0“tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
A 1.5 mm zeolite fraction increased yield by 3.9 kg per 1 m2.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- 1.5 mme0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.9 kg per 1 m2e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When zeolites of fractions 1 and 1.5 mm were included in the soil, the yield increased compared to the control by 3.5 and 3.9 kg per 1 m2, respectively”
t0“tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight was 141.5 g with 1.5 mm zeolite versus 84 g in control.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- zeolite fraction of 1.5 mme0
- Outcome
- average fruit weighte1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 141.5 ge0
- Qualifier
- 84 ge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it ranged from 84 g in control to 141.5 g in the variant, adding a zeolite fraction of 1.5 mm”
e1“The average fruit weight”
t0“tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite addition mitigated moisture shortage, especially in 2021.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- addition of zeolitee0
- Outcome
- lack of moisturee0
- Direction
- smoothed oute0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The addition of zeolite, especially the more significant fraction, smoothed out the lack of moisture, especially in 2021”
t0“tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite fruit was more than 1.5 times larger than control fruit.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- addition of zeolitese0
- Outcome
- fruits were more importante0
- Direction
- more importante0
- Value
- more than 1.5 timese0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the variants with the addition of zeolites, the fruits were more important than the control by more than 1.5 times”
t0“tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite tended to increase fruit dry matter and sugars.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- zeolitese1
- Outcome
- dry matter content, including the number of sugarse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a clear trend towards an increase in the dry matter content, including the number of sugars, in fruits”
t0“tomatoes”
e1“addition of different types of zeolites occurred faster”
Claim · model-written summary
Zeolite tended to decrease fruit nitrate content.
- Taxon
- tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- addition of zeolitese1
- Outcome
- nitrate contente0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a decrease in the nitrate content”
e1“addition of zeolites”
t0“tomatoes”
The same questions in other papers
zeolite · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
other · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
126 papers more in this group
See all 130 papers →other · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.