Paper · 2024 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of plant growth regulators on vegetative and phenological characters of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)

P. Dhal; S.K. Dash; P. Tripathy; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Department of Vegetable Science, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, consecutively for two years during kharif 2020 & 2021.Foliar spray of PGRs at various concentrations were given to okra crop cv.Utkal Gourav.The experiment was laid out in RBD with three replications and eleven treatments viz.,GA 3 (100 ppm) (T 1 ), GA 3 (150 ppm) (T 2 ), NAA (150 ppm) (T 3 ), NAA (200 ppm) (T 4 ), Thiourea (250 ppm) (T 5 ), Thiourea (500 ppm) (T 6 ), Cycocel (200 ppm) (T 7 ), Cycocel (250 ppm) (T 8 ), Paclobutrazol (100 ppm) (T 9 ), Paclobutrazol (200 ppm) (T 10 ) and Control (T 11 ).The foliar sprays were done at 15 DAS and 30 DAS.All growth parameters significantly performed better as compared to the control.The result revealed that NAA showed higher result with respect to plant height (144.56 cm) and internodal length (8.84 cm).Cycocel 250 ppm recorded significantly better with respect to no. of nodes per plant (21.66), no. of primary branches per plant (3.48), no. of leaves (32.81), leaf area (238.40 cm 2 ), leaf chlorophyll content (1.396 mg/100 g), days to 50 % flowering (35.00).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth parameters performed significantly better under growth regulator sprays than control.

Treatment
Foliar spray of PGRse1
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All growth parameters significantly performed better as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar spray of PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA gave a higher okra plant height of 144.56 cm.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
144.56 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA showed higher result with respect to plant height (144.56 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA gave a higher okra internodal length of 8.84 cm.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
internodal lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.84 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA showed higher result with respect to plant height (144.56 cm) and internodal length (8.84 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel 250 ppm gave 21.66 nodes per okra plant.

Treatment
Cycocel 250 ppme0
Outcome
no. of nodes per plante0
Direction
bettere0
Value
21.66e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cycocel 250 ppm recorded significantly better with respect to no. of nodes per plant (21.66)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel 250 ppm gave 3.48 primary branches per okra plant.

Treatment
Cycocel 250 ppme0
Outcome
no. of primary branches per plante0
Direction
bettere0
Value
3.48e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cycocel 250 ppm recorded significantly better with respect to no. of nodes per plant (21.66), no. of primary branches per plant (3.48)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel 250 ppm gave 32.81 okra leaves.

Treatment
Cycocel 250 ppme0
Outcome
no. of leavese0
Direction
bettere0
Value
32.81e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cycocel 250 ppm recorded significantly better with respect to no. of nodes per plant (21.66), no. of primary branches per plant (3.48), no. of leaves (32.81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel 250 ppm gave okra leaf area of 238.40 cm 2.

Treatment
Cycocel 250 ppme0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
bettere0
Value
238.40 cm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cycocel 250 ppm recorded significantly better with respect to no. of nodes per plant (21.66), no. of primary branches per plant (3.48), no. of leaves (32.81), leaf area (238.40 cm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel 250 ppm gave okra leaf chlorophyll content of 1.396 mg/100 g.

Treatment
Cycocel 250 ppme0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
bettere0
Value
1.396 mg/100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cycocel 250 ppm recorded significantly better with respect to no. of nodes per plant (21.66), no. of primary branches per plant (3.48), no. of leaves (32.81), leaf area (238.40 cm 2 ), leaf chlorophyll content (1.396 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel 250 ppm gave 35.00 days to 50% flowering in okra.

Treatment
Cycocel 250 ppme0
Outcome
days to 50 % floweringe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
35.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cycocel 250 ppm recorded significantly better with respect to no. of nodes per plant (21.66), no. of primary branches per plant (3.48), no. of leaves (32.81), leaf area (238.40 cm 2 ), leaf chlorophyll content (1.396 mg/100 g), days to 50 % flowering (35.00).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlormequat chloride · phenology · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chlormequat chloride · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

class · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 75 positive, 2 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.