Paper · 2024 · Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agricultural

OPTIMIZING MICRONUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR ENHANCED OKRA (ABELMOSCHUS ESCULENTUS L.) PRODUCTIVITY: A FOCUS ON ZINC AND BORON APPLICATION STRATEGIES

Shiva Prasad Adhikari; Prakash Awasthi; Punam Roka; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Okra is widely cultivated vegetable crop which has been reducing its quality due to inappropriate utilization of micro-nutrients as well. This research was carried out to investigate the impact of foliar spray of boron and zinc on the growth and yield of the okra ‘Arka Anamika’ variety. The experiment followed a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with seven treatments, including control, 0.2%Zn, 0.2%B, 0.3%Zn, 0.3% B, 0.2%Zn+0.2%B, and 0.3%Zn+0.3%B, replicated three times. Data on various parameters such as plant height, stem diameter, leaf number, number of branches, number of buds, number of fruits, length of fruits, girth of fruits, and yield were collected from sampled plants in each plot. Results indicated significant effects of different fertilizer treatments on these parameters. The highest values for plant height, stem diameter, number of branches, number of buds, fruit length, number of fruits, and yield were observed in T7, which was statistically at par with T6. Conversely, T1 (control) exhibited significantly lower values. The girth of fruits showed no any significant differences even due to various levels of foliar application of boron and zinc, either separately or in combination. Overall, the study suggests that the application of 0.3%Zn+0.3%B may be the most effective for improving the yield and yield parameters of okra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T7 spray produced the highest plant height, stem diameter, branches, buds, fruit length, fruit count and yield, at par with T6.

Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
plant height, stem diameter, number of branchese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
statistically at pare0
Comparator
T6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values for plant height, stem diameter, number of branches, number of buds, fruit length, number of fruits, and yield were observed in T7, which was statistically at par with T6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The control T1 had significantly lower growth and yield trait values.

Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
valuese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conversely, T1 (control) exhibited significantly lower values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit girth did not differ significantly across zinc and boron foliar treatments.

Treatment
foliar application of boron and zince0
Outcome
girth of fruitse0
Direction
no any significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The girth of fruits showed no any significant differences even due to various levels of foliar application of boron and zinc, either separately or in combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“OKRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 0.3%Zn+0.3%B for improving okra yield and yield parameters.

Treatment
0.3%Zn+0.3%Be0
Outcome
application of 0.3%Zn+0.3%Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 0.3%Zn+0.3%B may be the most effective for improving the yield and yield parameters of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1362 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 75 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.