Abstract
The experiment detail for the present investigation was comprised of 13 treatments in Randomized Block Design with three replication, to record morphological, phonological, yield attributes and economics. The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra. The maximum plant height was recorded when sprayed NAA @ 20 ppm. The higher number of leaves and length of internodes were recorded at NAA @ 40 ppm. Higher numbers of branches, higher length of internodes were recorded in foliar spray of cycocel@1000ppm. The foliar spray of growth regulators and micronutrient was recorded in significant improvement in leaf area on okra. The days taken to first flowering differed significantly the different treatment. The number of flower bud, the fruit length, fruit width, fruit per plant, fruit yield per plot, benefit cost ratio and fruit weight differed significantly in different treatment combination.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved okra plant height.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse1 - Treatment
- growth regulators and micronutriente1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum okra plant height was recorded with NAA at 20 ppm.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- NAA @ 20 ppme2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- maximume2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
e2“The maximum plant height was recorded when sprayed NAA @ 20 ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
NAA at 40 ppm gave a higher number of leaves and longer internodes in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- NAA @ 40 ppme3
- Outcome
- number of leaves and length of internodese3
- Direction
- highere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
e3“The higher number of leaves and length of internodes were recorded at NAA @ 40 ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spray of cycocel at 1000 ppm gave more branches and longer internodes in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- foliar spray of cycocel@1000ppme4
- Outcome
- numbers of branches, higher length of internodese4
- Direction
- Highere4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
e4“Higher numbers of branches, higher length of internodes were recorded in foliar spray of cycocel@1000ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spray of growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved okra leaf area.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse5
- Treatment
- foliar spray of growth regulators and micronutriente5
- Outcome
- leaf areae5
- Direction
- significant improvemente5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The foliar spray of growth regulators and micronutrient was recorded in significant improvement in leaf area on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments differed significantly in days taken to first flowering in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- different treatmente6
- Outcome
- days taken to first floweringe6
- Direction
- differede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
e6“The days taken to first flowering differed significantly the different treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of flower buds, fruit length and fruit width differed significantly among treatment combinations in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- different treatment combinatione7
- Outcome
- number of flower bud, the fruit length, fruit widthe7
- Direction
- differede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
e7“The number of flower bud, the fruit length, fruit width, fruit per plant, fruit yield per plot, benefit cost ratio and fruit weight differed significantly in different treatment combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit per plant and fruit yield per plot differed significantly among treatment combinations in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- different treatment combinatione7
- Outcome
- fruit per plant, fruit yield per plote7
- Direction
- differede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
e7“The number of flower bud, the fruit length, fruit width, fruit per plant, fruit yield per plot, benefit cost ratio and fruit weight differed significantly in different treatment combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio and fruit weight differed significantly among treatment combinations in okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- different treatment combinatione7
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratio and fruit weighte7
- Direction
- differede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The growth regulators and micronutrient significantly improved the plant height of okra”
e7“The number of flower bud, the fruit length, fruit width, fruit per plant, fruit yield per plot, benefit cost ratio and fruit weight differed significantly in different treatment combination”
The same questions in other papers
chlormequat chloride · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →micronutrient · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →class · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.