Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and quality parameter of wheat (Triticum aestivum): Summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.) cropping sequence in middle Gujarat condition

PG Gamar; GJ Patel; VN Raiyani

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at A field experiment was conducted at Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat, during the winter (rabi) and summer seasons 2019-20 and 2020-21, to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and its residual effect on succeeding green gram (Vigna radiata L.) under irrigated condition. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with 10 treatments and 4 replications. Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) resulted in the higher grain (4114 kg ha-1) and stover yield (5662 kg ha-1) as well as protein content (12.52%) and protein yield (515 kg ha-1) wheat crop. In succeeding green gram crop, residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) recorded higher grain (1215 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (2735 kg ha-1) along with protein content (20.78%) and protein yield (253 kg ha-1) of crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF with FYM, NPK consortium, sulphur and zinc gave a higher wheat grain yield (4114 kg ha-1).

Treatment
Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e1
Outcome
graine1
Direction
highere1
Value
4114 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) resulted in the higher grain (4114 kg ha-1) and stover yield (5662 kg ha-1) as well as protein content (12.52%) and protein yield (515 kg ha-1) wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave a higher wheat stover yield (5662 kg ha-1).

Treatment
Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e1
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
5662 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) resulted in the higher grain (4114 kg ha-1) and stover yield (5662 kg ha-1) as well as protein content (12.52%) and protein yield (515 kg ha-1) wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave a higher wheat protein content (12.52%).

Treatment
Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e1
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
12.52%e1
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) resulted in the higher grain (4114 kg ha-1) and stover yield (5662 kg ha-1) as well as protein content (12.52%) and protein yield (515 kg ha-1) wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave a higher wheat protein yield (515 kg ha-1).

Treatment
Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e1
Outcome
protein yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
515 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) resulted in the higher grain (4114 kg ha-1) and stover yield (5662 kg ha-1) as well as protein content (12.52%) and protein yield (515 kg ha-1) wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual effect of the same nutrient treatment gave a higher green gram grain yield (1215 kg ha-1).

Treatment
residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e2
Outcome
graine2
Direction
highere2
Value
1215 kg ha-1e2
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e2

“In succeeding green gram crop, residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) recorded higher grain (1215 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (2735 kg ha-1) along with protein content (20.78%) and protein yield (253 kg ha-1) of crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual effect gave a higher green gram haulm yield (2735 kg ha-1).

Treatment
residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e2
Outcome
haulm yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
2735 kg ha-1e2
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e2

“In succeeding green gram crop, residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) recorded higher grain (1215 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (2735 kg ha-1) along with protein content (20.78%) and protein yield (253 kg ha-1) of crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual effect gave a higher green gram protein content (20.78%).

Treatment
residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e2
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
highere2
Value
20.78%e2
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e2

“In succeeding green gram crop, residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) recorded higher grain (1215 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (2735 kg ha-1) along with protein content (20.78%) and protein yield (253 kg ha-1) of crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual effect gave a higher green gram protein yield (253 kg ha-1).

Treatment
residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4)e2
Outcome
protein yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
253 kg ha-1e2
Setting
Devgadh Baria, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribal Research cum Training Centre Farm, Anand Agricultural University, Devgadh Baria, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–167 · show in text ↑
e2

“In succeeding green gram crop, residual effect of application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + NPK consortium + Sulphur @ 20 kg ha-1 (gypsum) + 10 kg ha-1 ZnSO4) recorded higher grain (1215 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (2735 kg ha-1) along with protein content (20.78%) and protein yield (253 kg ha-1) of crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1176 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.