Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Plant Production

Biofortification with Zinc and Iron Improves the Grain Quality and Yield of Wheat Crop

Yasir Ramzan; Muhammad Bilal Hafeez; Shahbaz Khan; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
131
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Hidden hunger is emerging as a major challenge for agricultural scientists because world population is increasing and food production is augmenting. Metals deficiencies (micronutrient malnutrition), especially Zn and Fe, are affecting over half of global population because they are depending cereal crops mainly wheat rice and maize for their daily diet. There are various possible techniques to overcome the hidden hunger but agronomic biofortification is one of the major agricultural strategies to enhance the grain concentration of micronutrients. Application of iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) and as alone or in combination either soil and foliar application increased the height of plants, number of tillers, spike length, number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, thousand grain weight, economical yield, biological yield and harvesting index, calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc, copper and protein contents. Among different Zn and Fe concentrations applied either soil supplement or foliar spray, combine foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4 significantly improved the maximum growth or quality attributes of wheat. Biofortification is one of the major agricultural strategies to enhance the concentration of micronutrients in grains to minimize the malnutrition. Combination of Zn and Fe as foliar spray (0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4) increased the yield traits of wheat crop as well as quality parameters of grains. Foliar application method is more appropriate for availability of nutrients to plants for optimum growth as compared to soil application method. Combined application of Zn and Fe (0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4) through foliar spray is recommended to enhance the productivity of wheat crop with good quality of grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil or foliar application of FeSO4 and ZnSO4, alone or combined, increased plant height, tiller number and spike length of wheat.

Treatment
iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
height of plants, number of tillers, spike lengthe1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) and as alone or in combination either soil and foliar application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“the height of plants, number of tillers, spike length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same applications increased spikelets per spike, grains per spike and thousand grain weight of wheat.

Treatment
iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, thousand grain weighte1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) and as alone or in combination either soil and foliar application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same applications increased economical yield, biological yield and harvest index of wheat.

Treatment
iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
economical yield, biological yield and harvesting indexe1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) and as alone or in combination either soil and foliar application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“economical yield, biological yield and harvesting index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same applications increased calcium, magnesium and iron contents of wheat.

Treatment
iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
calcium, magnesium, irone1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) and as alone or in combination either soil and foliar application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“calcium, magnesium, iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same applications increased zinc, copper and protein contents of wheat.

Treatment
iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4)e0
Outcome
zinc, copper and protein contentse1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of iron sulphate (FeSO4) zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) and as alone or in combination either soil and foliar application increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“zinc, copper and protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the Zn and Fe concentrations and the soil or foliar methods, combined foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4 significantly improved the maximum growth or quality attributes of wheat.

Treatment
combine foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4e0
Outcome
maximum growth or quality attributese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
different Zn and Fe concentrations applied either soil supplement or foliar spraye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combine foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4 significantly improved the maximum growth or quality attributes of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“different Zn and Fe concentrations applied either soil supplement or foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1030 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined foliar application of Zn and Fe (0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4) to enhance productivity and grain quality of wheat.

Treatment
Combined application of Zn and Fe (0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4) through foliar spraye0
Outcome
productivity of wheat crop with good quality of grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of Zn and Fe (0.5% ZnSO4 and 1% FeSO4) through foliar spray is recommended to enhance the productivity of wheat crop with good quality of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1761 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that foliar application is more appropriate than soil application for nutrient availability and optimum plant growth.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Foliar application methode0
Outcome
availability of nutrients to plants for optimum growthe0
Comparator
soil application methode0

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application method is more appropriate for availability of nutrients to plants for optimum growth as compared to soil application method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1594 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

iron atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.