Paper · 2024 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of residue incorporation and INM on productivity of spring maize (Zea mays) in rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping system

PRIYANKA SAHOO; THAKAR SINGH; KULVIR SINGH SAINI; et al.

13
claims
34
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2019 and 2020 at the research farm of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab to study the effect of integrated nutrient management (INM) on grain yield, economics, and system productivity of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system. The main plot consisted of 4 treatment combinations, viz. straw removal + 100% NPK + farmyard manure (FYM) @50 t/ha; straw removal + 150% NPK; straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha; and straw incorporation + 150% NPK, while sub-plot consisted of 3 nutrient levels (75%, 100% and 125% NPK) applied to spring maize planted in a single row and double rows on bed. The results revealed that combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize and application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively. Residue incorporation along with INM increased grain yield, net returns, nutrient uptake and system productivity of spring maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher grain yield in 2019 (80.1).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
80.1e1
Qualifier
2019e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher grain yield in 2020 (83.6 q/ha).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
83.6 q/hae1
Qualifier
2020e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher net returns in 2019 (259.9).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
highere1
Value
259.9e1
Qualifier
2019e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher net returns in 2020 (300.2 ×103 ₹/ha).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
highere1
Value
300.2 ×103 ₹/hae1
Qualifier
2020e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher benefit cost ratio in 2019 (1.34).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.34e1
Qualifier
2019e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher benefit cost ratio in 2020 (1.51).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.51e1
Qualifier
2020e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher system productivity in 2019 (82.9).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
system productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
82.9e1
Qualifier
2019e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation plus NPK and FYM gave significantly higher system productivity in 2020 (89.1 kg/ha/day).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/hae1
Outcome
system productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
89.1 kg/ha/daye1
Qualifier
2020e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of straw incorporation + 100% NPK + FYM @50 t/ha resulted in significantly higher grain yield (80.1 and 83.6 q/ha), net returns (259.9 and 300.2 ×103 ₹/ha), benefit cost ratio (1.34 and 1.51) and system productivity (82.9 and 89.1 kg/ha/day) of spring maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–1003 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% NPK in double rows on beds gave significantly higher grain yield than 100% NPK in single rows in 2019 (14.6%).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
125% NPK to double row on bede1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
14.6%e1
Qualifier
2019e1
Comparator
100% NPK to single row on bede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% NPK in double rows on beds gave significantly higher grain yield than 100% NPK in single rows in 2020 (12.9%).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
125% NPK to double row on bede1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
12.9%e1
Qualifier
2020e1
Comparator
100% NPK to single row on bede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% NPK in double rows on beds gave significantly higher system productivity than 100% NPK in single rows in 2019 (5.4%).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
125% NPK to double row on bede1
Outcome
system productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
5.4%e1
Qualifier
2019e1
Comparator
100% NPK to single row on bede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% NPK in double rows on beds gave significantly higher system productivity than 100% NPK in single rows in 2020 (4.7%).

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
125% NPK to double row on bede1
Outcome
system productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
4.7%e1
Qualifier
2020e1
Comparator
100% NPK to single row on bede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125% NPK to double row on bed resulted in significantly higher grain yield (14.6%, 12.9%) and system productivity (5.4%, 4.7%) as compared to 100% NPK to single row on bed during 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation with INM increased maize nutrient uptake.

Taxon
spring maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
Residue incorporation along with INMe1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring maize (Zea mays L.) under residue incorporation in a diversified cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“Residue incorporation along with INM increased grain yield, net returns, nutrient uptake and system productivity of spring maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1360 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.