Abstract
This paper presents the effects of organic fertilizers on the yield, quality, and fatty acid composition of maize and soybean in 2022 in Southeast Kazakhstan. Maize and soybean yields were improved by commercial organic fertilizers. In general, the yield, quality, and fatty acid (FA) parameters of both crops were influenced by various types of organic fertilizers. The application of HansePlant fertilizer allowed for an increase in the yield of maize seed by 47% and soybean by 31%. Organic fertilizers improved the quality parameters fat, protein, fiber, and starch in maize by 35%, 22%, 14%, and 8%, respectively, compared to control samples. In soybean, the parameters fat, protein, and fiber were improved by 20%, 3%, and 11%, respectively. The FA compositions of maize and soybean were analyzed via gas chromatography and with tandem mass spectrometer using a polarity column. Compared with no fertilization conditions, the omega-6/omega-3 ratio showed the lowest value in maize (22.40–123.96) and soybean (3.26–4.07). A study of the fatty acid composition groups compared with different fertilizer treatments was performed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
HansePlant increased maize seed yield by 47%.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of HansePlant fertilizer allowed for an increase in the yield of maize seed by 47%”
Claim · model-written summary
HansePlant increased soybean yield by 31%.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- HansePlant fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soybeane0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 31%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of HansePlant fertilizer allowed for an increase in the yield of maize seed by 47% and soybean by 31%”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers improved maize fat by 35%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Organic fertilizers improved the quality parameters fat, protein, fiber, and starch in maize by 35%, 22%, 14%, and 8%, respectively, compared to control samples”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers improved maize protein by 22%.
- Treatment
- Organic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- proteine0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 22%e0
- Comparator
- control samplese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Organic fertilizers improved the quality parameters fat, protein, fiber, and starch in maize by 35%, 22%, 14%, and 8%, respectively, compared to control samples”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers improved maize fiber by 14%.
- Treatment
- Organic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- fibere0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 14%e0
- Comparator
- control samplese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Organic fertilizers improved the quality parameters fat, protein, fiber, and starch in maize by 35%, 22%, 14%, and 8%, respectively, compared to control samples”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers improved maize starch by 8%.
- Treatment
- Organic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- starche0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 8%e0
- Comparator
- control samplese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Organic fertilizers improved the quality parameters fat, protein, fiber, and starch in maize by 35%, 22%, 14%, and 8%, respectively, compared to control samples”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers improved soybean fat by 20%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In soybean, the parameters fat, protein, and fiber were improved by 20%, 3%, and 11%, respectively”
t0“Organic Fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers improved soybean protein by 3%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In soybean, the parameters fat, protein, and fiber were improved by 20%, 3%, and 11%, respectively”
t0“Organic Fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizers improved soybean fiber by 11%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In soybean, the parameters fat, protein, and fiber were improved by 20%, 3%, and 11%, respectively”
t0“Organic Fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
The maize omega-6/omega-3 ratio had the lowest reported range of 22.40–123.96 relative to no fertilization.
- Treatment
- organic fertilizerst0
- Outcome
- omega-6/omega-3 ratioe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 22.40–123.96e0
- Comparator
- no fertilization conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with no fertilization conditions, the omega-6/omega-3 ratio showed the lowest value in maize (22.40–123.96)”
t0“Organic Fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
The soybean omega-6/omega-3 ratio had the lowest reported range of 3.26–4.07 relative to no fertilization.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- organic fertilizerst0
- Outcome
- omega-6/omega-3 ratioe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 3.26–4.07e0
- Comparator
- no fertilization conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with no fertilization conditions, the omega-6/omega-3 ratio showed the lowest value in maize (22.40–123.96) and soybean (3.26–4.07)”
t0“Organic Fertilizers”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- negative
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
102 papers more in this group
See all 106 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
130 papers more in this group
See all 134 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
235 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
258 papers more in this group
See all 262 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.