Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of different irrigation and fertigation schedules on growth and productivity of Red Velox apple in Northwestern Himalayan region

Shakshi Mankotia; J. C. Sharma

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted at the experimental farm of Department of Soil Science and Water Management, Dr. YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (HP) to study the effect of different irrigation and fertigation schedules on growth and productivity of Red Velox apple in Northwestern Himalayan region. A factorial experiment comprised of sixteen treatment combination of four drip irrigation levels viz. drip irrigation at 100% ETc (I1), drip irrigation at 80% ETc (I2), drip irrigation at 60% ETc (I3), conventional irrigation (I4) and four levels of fertigation viz. absolute control; no application of fertilizer (F0), 100% of adhoc dose of NPK (F1), 75% of adhoc dose of NPK (F2) and 50% of adhoc dose of NPK (F3) were replicated thrice with three plants in each replication. With an increase in the volume of water and an increasing dose of NPK, vegetative growth parameters (tree height, tree spread, trunk girth, tree volume and annual extension growth), leaf nutrient content and yield were noted to be significantly increased. Drip irrigation at 100% ETc (I1) and fertigation at 100% of adhoc dose of NPK (F1) significantly increased the growth, foliage nutrient content and productivity of apple. Interaction I1F1 recorded highest growth parameters, leaf NPK content as well as yield. The results of two years experiment indicated a positive impact of drip irrigation and fertigation schedules on enhanced fertilization effectiveness and improved vegetative growth, leaf nutrient content and yield of apple.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water and NPK significantly increased apple vegetative growth parameters.

Treatment
an increase in the volume of water and an increasing dose of NPKe0
Outcome
vegetative growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase in the volume of water and an increasing dose of NPK, vegetative growth parameters (tree height, tree spread, trunk girth, tree volume and annual extension growth), leaf nutrient content and yield were noted to be significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Velox apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water and NPK significantly increased apple leaf nutrient content.

Treatment
an increase in the volume of water and an increasing dose of NPKe0
Outcome
leaf nutrient contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase in the volume of water and an increasing dose of NPK, vegetative growth parameters (tree height, tree spread, trunk girth, tree volume and annual extension growth), leaf nutrient content and yield were noted to be significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Velox apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water and NPK significantly increased apple yield.

Treatment
an increase in the volume of water and an increasing dose of NPKe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase in the volume of water and an increasing dose of NPK, vegetative growth parameters (tree height, tree spread, trunk girth, tree volume and annual extension growth), leaf nutrient content and yield were noted to be significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Velox apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I1F1 combination recorded the highest growth parameters.

Treatment
I1F1e0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction I1F1 recorded highest growth parameters, leaf NPK content as well as yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Velox apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I1F1 combination recorded the highest leaf NPK content.

Treatment
I1F1e0
Outcome
leaf NPK contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction I1F1 recorded highest growth parameters, leaf NPK content as well as yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Velox apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I1F1 combination recorded the highest yield.

Treatment
I1F1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction I1F1 recorded highest growth parameters, leaf NPK content as well as yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Velox apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 90 positive, 16 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.