Paper · 1995 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Leaf Nutrition and Soil Nutrients Are Affected by Irrigation Frequency and Method for NP-Fertigated `Gala' Apple

G.H. Neilsen; P. Parchomchuk; D. Neilsen; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh) on M.26 rootstock was subjected, in the first five growing seasons, to NP-fertigation and a factorial combination of treatments involving method and frequency of irrigation. Two types of emitters (drip or microjet) were used to apply the same quantity of water at high (daily), intermediate (about weekly) and low (about bi-weekly) irrigation frequencies. Although initial tree vigor and yield were higher for drip-fertigated trees, by the end of the study microjet fertigation produced larger trees of similar yield. These microjet fertigated trees had higher leaf P, K and Cu but lower leaf N, Mg, and Mn than drip-fertigated trees. Soil pH and extractable Mg and K concentrations were higher and extractable-P concentrations lower directly beneath microjet-emitters as a result of the larger fertigated soil volume relative to drip-emitters. High frequency irrigation improved tree growth but had less effect on leaf nutrient concentrations or soil chemical changes than lower frequency irrigation. Leaf N concentration was most affected by irrigation frequency, tending to decrease with daily irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microjet fertigation produced larger trees than drip fertigation by the end of the study.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
microjet fertigatione1
Outcome
treese1
Direction
largere1
Comparator
drip-fertigated treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although initial tree vigor and yield were higher for drip-fertigated trees, by the end of the study microjet fertigation produced larger trees of similar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microjet fertigation gave yield similar to drip fertigation.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
microjet fertigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
drip-fertigated treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although initial tree vigor and yield were higher for drip-fertigated trees, by the end of the study microjet fertigation produced larger trees of similar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial tree vigor and yield were higher for drip-fertigated trees.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
drip-fertigated treese1
Outcome
initial tree vigor and yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although initial tree vigor and yield were higher for drip-fertigated trees, by the end of the study microjet fertigation produced larger trees of similar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microjet fertigated trees had higher leaf P, K and Cu than drip-fertigated trees.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
microjet fertigatede2
Outcome
leaf P, K and Cue2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
drip-fertigated treese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e2

“These microjet fertigated trees had higher leaf P, K and Cu but lower leaf N, Mg, and Mn than drip-fertigated trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microjet fertigated trees had lower leaf N, Mg and Mn than drip-fertigated trees.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
microjet fertigatede2
Outcome
leaf N, Mg, and Mne2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
drip-fertigated treese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e2

“These microjet fertigated trees had higher leaf P, K and Cu but lower leaf N, Mg, and Mn than drip-fertigated trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under microjet emitters, soil pH and extractable Mg and K concentrations were higher than under drip emitters, owing to the larger fertigated soil volume.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
microjet-emitterse3
Outcome
Soil pH and extractable Mg and K concentrationse3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
larger fertigated soil volumee3
Comparator
drip-emitterse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soil pH and extractable Mg and K concentrations were higher and extractable-P concentrations lower directly beneath microjet-emitters as a result of the larger fertigated soil volume relative to drip-emitters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under microjet emitters, extractable-P concentrations were lower than under drip emitters.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
microjet-emitterse3
Outcome
extractable-P concentrationse3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
drip-emitterse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soil pH and extractable Mg and K concentrations were higher and extractable-P concentrations lower directly beneath microjet-emitters as a result of the larger fertigated soil volume relative to drip-emitters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High frequency irrigation improved tree growth compared with lower frequency irrigation.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
High frequency irrigatione4
Outcome
tree growthe4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
lower frequency irrigatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“High frequency irrigation improved tree growth but had less effect on leaf nutrient concentrations or soil chemical changes than lower frequency irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High frequency irrigation had less effect on leaf nutrient concentrations or soil chemical changes than lower frequency irrigation.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
High frequency irrigatione4
Outcome
leaf nutrient concentrations or soil chemical changese4
Direction
less effecte4
Comparator
lower frequency irrigatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“High frequency irrigation improved tree growth but had less effect on leaf nutrient concentrations or soil chemical changes than lower frequency irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf N concentration was most affected by irrigation frequency and tended to decrease with daily irrigation.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
daily irrigatione5
Outcome
Leaf N concentratione5
Direction
decreasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Gala' apple (Malus domestica Borkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
e5

“Leaf N concentration was most affected by irrigation frequency, tending to decrease with daily irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1144 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

67 papers: 52 positive, 15 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

irrigation · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 150 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.