Paper · 2023 · The Andhra Agricultural Journal

Effect of Nutrient Management Practices on Productivity and Quality in Finger Millet under Zero Tillage Conditions in Rice Fallows

Y Sandhya Rani; U Triveni; N Anuradha; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Zero tillage and minimum till systems often result in greater stratification of physical, chemical and biological soil environment which differs greatly from that of conventional tillage. Hence keeping in view of the importance of zero tillage in conservation of soil health and with an aim to increase the production and productivity of finger millet under rice fallow conditions, this experiment was conducted to standardize the fertilizer management technology of finger millet under zero tillage. The experiment was conducted for three years from 2017-18 to 2019-20 during the Rabi season at Agricultural Research Station, Vizianagaram. Results showed that grain yield of finger millet was found to be significantly higher in the treatment received with 150% RDF (3571 kg ha -1 ) along with spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering and it was on par with 125% RDF + spraying of 1% KNO 3 (3309 kg ha -1 ). Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering along with basal application of NPK helped in further increase in grain yield, compared to their respective treatments of NPK alone to the tune of 2.9% in 50% RDF, 5.8% at 75% RDF, 5.6% at 100% RDF, 5.7% at 125% RDF and 4.11% at 150% RDF respectively. The highest net returns and B:C ratio were recorded in 150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray(2.53) which is very closely followed by 125% RDF+ 1% KNO3 foliar spray(2.42). Similarly soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were significantly high in 150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray, and it was on par with 150% RDF and 125% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray. From this study, 125% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray was found to be the best nutrient management in finger millet grown under zero tillage conditions in rice fallow situation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150% RDF plus 1% KNO 3 spray treatment produced significantly higher finger millet grain yield of 3571 kg ha -1 and was on par with 125% RDF plus spray at 3309 kg ha -1.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
150% RDF (3571 kg ha -1 ) along with spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after floweringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
3571 kg ha -1e0
Qualifier
3309 kg ha -1e0
Comparator
125% RDF + spraying of 1% KNO 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of finger millet was found to be significantly higher in the treatment received with 150% RDF (3571 kg ha -1 ) along with spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering and it was on par with 125% RDF + spraying of 1% KNO 3 (3309 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% KNO 3 with 50% RDF increased finger millet grain yield by 2.9% versus NPK alone.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after floweringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.9%e0
Qualifier
50% RDFe0
Comparator
NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering along with basal application of NPK helped in further increase in grain yield, compared to their respective treatments of NPK alone to the tune of 2.9% in 50% RDF, 5.8% at 75% RDF, 5.6% at 100% RDF, 5.7% at 125% RDF and 4.11% at 150% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% KNO 3 with 75% RDF increased finger millet grain yield by 5.8% versus NPK alone.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after floweringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.8%e0
Qualifier
75% RDFe0
Comparator
NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering along with basal application of NPK helped in further increase in grain yield, compared to their respective treatments of NPK alone to the tune of 2.9% in 50% RDF, 5.8% at 75% RDF, 5.6% at 100% RDF, 5.7% at 125% RDF and 4.11% at 150% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% KNO 3 with 100% RDF increased finger millet grain yield by 5.6% versus NPK alone.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after floweringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.6%e0
Qualifier
100% RDFe0
Comparator
NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering along with basal application of NPK helped in further increase in grain yield, compared to their respective treatments of NPK alone to the tune of 2.9% in 50% RDF, 5.8% at 75% RDF, 5.6% at 100% RDF, 5.7% at 125% RDF and 4.11% at 150% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% KNO 3 with 125% RDF increased finger millet grain yield by 5.7% versus NPK alone.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after floweringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.7%e0
Qualifier
125% RDFe0
Comparator
NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering along with basal application of NPK helped in further increase in grain yield, compared to their respective treatments of NPK alone to the tune of 2.9% in 50% RDF, 5.8% at 75% RDF, 5.6% at 100% RDF, 5.7% at 125% RDF and 4.11% at 150% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% KNO 3 with 150% RDF increased finger millet grain yield by 4.11% versus NPK alone.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after floweringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.11%e0
Qualifier
150% RDFe0
Comparator
NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of 1% KNO 3 twice at flower initiation stage and 15 days after flowering along with basal application of NPK helped in further increase in grain yield, compared to their respective treatments of NPK alone to the tune of 2.9% in 50% RDF, 5.8% at 75% RDF, 5.6% at 100% RDF, 5.7% at 125% RDF and 4.11% at 150% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150% RDF plus foliar spray had the highest net returns and B:C ratio, with a B:C ratio of 2.53.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spraye0
Outcome
net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net returns and B:C ratio were recorded in 150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray(2.53) which is very closely followed by 125% RDF+ 1% KNO3 foliar spray(2.42).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% RDF plus foliar spray closely followed with a B:C ratio of 2.42.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
125% RDF+ 1% KNO3 foliar spraye0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
2.42e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net returns and B:C ratio were recorded in 150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray(2.53) which is very closely followed by 125% RDF+ 1% KNO3 foliar spray(2.42).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were significantly high under 150% RDF plus spray and on par with two comparator treatments.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spraye0
Outcome
soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassiume0
Direction
significantly highe0
Comparator
150% RDF and 125% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were significantly high in 150% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray, and it was on par with 150% RDF and 125% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 125% RDF plus foliar spray as the best nutrient management for finger millet under zero tillage in rice fallows.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
125% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spraye0
Outcome
best nutrient managemente0
Qualifier
zero tillage conditions in rice fallow situatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125% RDF+1% KNO3 foliar spray was found to be the best nutrient management in finger millet grown under zero tillage conditions in rice fallow situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1801 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

application · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.