Abstract
AbstractThe application of imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 100 ml/ha produced the highest yield (10.24 q/ha), however thiamethoxam 25 WG at 100 g/ha produced the treatment with the highest cost-benefit ratio (1: 9.78). This is because imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 100 ml/ha is more expensive. The treatment with emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 200 g/ha produced the lowest yield (7.50 q/ha), however the treatment with spinosad 45 SC @ 200 ml/ha had a lower cost-benefit ratio.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 100 ml/ha gave the highest yield, 10.24 q/ha.
- Taxon
- black gram
Vigna mungot0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 100 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10.24 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 100 ml/ha produced the highest yield (10.24 q/ha)”
t0“black gram, [Vigna mungo (L.)]”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam at 100 g/ha gave the highest cost benefit ratio of 1: 9.78.
- Taxon
- black gramVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25 WG at 100 g/hae0
- Outcome
- cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1: 9.78e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“thiamethoxam 25 WG at 100 g/ha produced the treatment with the highest cost-benefit ratio (1: 9.78)”
t0“black gram, [Vigna mungo (L.)]”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 100 ml/ha was more expensive.
- Taxon
- black gramVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 100 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- expensivee0
- Direction
- moree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“imidacloprid 17.8 SL at 100 ml/ha is more expensive”
t0“black gram, [Vigna mungo (L.)]”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate at 200 g/ha gave the lowest yield of 7.50 q/ha.
- Taxon
- black gramVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 200 g/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 7.50 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment with emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 200 g/ha produced the lowest yield (7.50 q/ha)”
t0“black gram, [Vigna mungo (L.)]”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad at 200 ml/ha had a lower cost benefit ratio.
- Taxon
- black gramVigna mungot0
- Treatment
- spinosad 45 SC @ 200 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment with spinosad 45 SC @ 200 ml/ha had a lower cost-benefit ratio”
t0“black gram, [Vigna mungo (L.)]”
The same questions in other papers
spinosad · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
thiamethoxam · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.