Paper · 2010 · Legume Research - An International Journal

FIELD EFFICACY OF CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST SPOTTED POD BORER, MARUCA VITRATA (FABRICIUS) INFESTING BLACKGRAM*

V. R. Sonune; R. K. Bharodia; D. M. Jethva; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to determine the efficacy of nine chemical insecticides against spotted pod borer, [Maruca vitrata (Fabricius)] infesting blackgram during kharif season of 2008. The results revealed that spinosad 0.009 %, indoxacarb 0.008 %, profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % were found the most effective in reducing the larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgram. The maximum per cent increase in seed yield (79.37 per cent) of blackgram over control was recorded in the treatment of spinosad 0.009 %. The next effective treatments were indoxacarb 0.008 %, profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 %. The treatments of profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % gave the highest incremental cost benefit ratio of 1:12.53 and 1:12.29, respectively followed by endosulfan 0.07 % (1:7.81), profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (0.044 %; 1:6.81), indoxacarb 0.008 % (1:5.94) and spinosad 0.009 % (1:5.24). Thus, two sprays of profenophos 0.05 % or lambda cyhalothrin 0.05 % or endosulfan 0.07 % or profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (0.044 %) or indoxacarb 0.008 % or spinosad 0.009 %, first at the time of 50 % flowering and second at 15 days after first spray can be suggested to the farmers for controlling this pest on blackgram and to get more benefit during the kharif season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad reduced larval population and pod damage.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
spinosad 0.009 %e0
Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgrame0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad 0.009 %, indoxacarb 0.008 %, profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % were found the most effective in reducing the larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb reduced larval population and pod damage.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
indoxacarb 0.008 %e0
Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgrame0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad 0.009 %, indoxacarb 0.008 %, profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % were found the most effective in reducing the larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenophos reduced larval population and pod damage.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
profenophos 0.05 %e0
Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgrame0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad 0.009 %, indoxacarb 0.008 %, profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % were found the most effective in reducing the larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin reduced larval population and pod damage.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 %e0
Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgrame0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad 0.009 %, indoxacarb 0.008 %, profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % were found the most effective in reducing the larval population of M. vitrata and also to reduce the pod damage of blackgram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad increased seed yield 79.37 per cent over control.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
spinosad 0.009 %e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
79.37 per cente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum per cent increase in seed yield (79.37 per cent) of blackgram over control was recorded in the treatment of spinosad 0.009 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenophos had the highest cost benefit ratio of 1:12.53.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
profenophos 0.05 %e0
Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:12.53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments of profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % gave the highest incremental cost benefit ratio of 1:12.53 and 1:12.29, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“BLACKGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda cyhalothrin had a cost benefit ratio of 1:12.29.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 %e0
Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:12.29e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments of profenophos 0.05 % and lambda cyhalothrin 0.005 % gave the highest incremental cost benefit ratio of 1:12.53 and 1:12.29, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“BLACKGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan had a cost benefit ratio of 1:7.81.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
endosulfan 0.07 %e0
Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe2
Value
1:7.81e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“endosulfan 0.07 % (1:7.81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“BLACKGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest incremental cost benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined profenophos and cypermethrin had a cost benefit ratio of 1:6.81.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 ECe0
Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe2
Value
1:6.81e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (0.044 %; 1:6.81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“BLACKGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest incremental cost benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb had a cost benefit ratio of 1:5.94.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
indoxacarb 0.008 %e0
Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe2
Value
1:5.94e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indoxacarb 0.008 % (1:5.94)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“BLACKGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest incremental cost benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad had a cost benefit ratio of 1:5.24.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
spinosad 0.009 %e0
Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe2
Value
1:5.24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinosad 0.009 % (1:5.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“BLACKGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest incremental cost benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–794 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest two sprays of effective insecticides for pod borer control and benefit.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Outcome
controlling this pest on blackgram and to get more benefite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, two sprays of profenophos 0.05 % or lambda cyhalothrin 0.05 % or endosulfan 0.07 % or profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (0.044 %) or indoxacarb 0.008 % or spinosad 0.009 %, first at the time of 50 % flowering and second at 15 days after first spray can be suggested to the farmers for controlling this pest on blackgram and to get more benefit during the kharif season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1367 · show in text ↑

spinosad · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · Maruca vitrata · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lambda-cyhalothrin · Maruca vitrata · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.