Paper · 2015 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION

Competitive studies of insecticides for the control of sucking pests in urdbean (Vigna mungo) in relation to yield

SHLOKESHWAR R. SHARMA; DHERMENDRA PRAKASH SINGH

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted during the Kharif season of 2012 and 2013 for knowing the competitive study of insecticides as foliar application for the control of sucking pests such as jassid, thrips and whitefly in urdbean in relation to yield gap. Population of thrips, jassid and white fly were recorded with crop age and found that the population of all the three pest increased with increase the crop age up to reproductive stage 4.06 jassid/6 leaves, 6.32/6 leaves thrips and 9.54 whitefly/6 plants, respectively at 48 days after sowing. Reproductive stage was more vulnerable than vegetative and maturity stage. Among the treatments against jassid, imidacloprid was found more effective (1.14 jassid/6 leaves) Followed by thiamethoxam (1.15) and acitamiprid (2.24)in the year 2012. However same result was noted in the year 2013 in case of above used insecticides. Imidacloprid significantly showed better effect to control the thrips (1.34 and 0.95/6 leaves in 2012 and 2013, respectively). In case of whiteflies, thiamethoxam gave significantly good control (2.11 in 2012 and 2.69 in 2013/6 plants) followed by imidacloprid and acetamiprid during both the seasons. Highest population of all the three sucking pests was noted in control plot. Significantly maximum yield in 2012 was found in imidacloprid treated plot (11.33q/ha) followed by thiamethaxam (10.88q/ha) and acetamiprid (10.77q/ha) in comparison to trizophos (9.55q/ha) and monocrotophos (8.55q/ha). However, malathian and chloropyriphos had least effect on increase the yield. Only 5.22q/ha yield was found in control plot. In the year 2013, thiamehaxam gave better results in increasing the yield (11.93q/ha) than other tested insecticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips, jassid and whitefly populations rose with crop age up to the reproductive stage.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Organ / stage
reproductive stagee0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
population of all the three peste0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population of thrips, jassid and white fly were recorded with crop age and found that the population of all the three pest increased with increase the crop age up to reproductive stage 4.06 jassid/6 leaves, 6.32/6 leaves thrips and 9.54 whitefly/6 plants, respectively at 48 days after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid was most effective against jassids in 2012.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
imidaclopride0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jasside0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
1.14 jassid/6 leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments against jassid, imidacloprid was found more effective (1.14 jassid/6 leaves) Followed by thiamethoxam (1.15) and acitamiprid (2.24)in the year 2012.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid significantly controlled thrips in 2012 and 2013.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Imidaclopride0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thripse0
Direction
bettere0
Value
1.34 and 0.95/6 leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid significantly showed better effect to control the thrips (1.34 and 0.95/6 leaves in 2012 and 2013, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam significantly controlled whiteflies in both years.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
thiamethoxame0
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae0pest
Outcome
whitefliese0
Direction
good controle0
Value
2.11 in 2012 and 2.69 in 2013/6 plantse0
Comparator
imidacloprid and acetamipride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of whiteflies, thiamethoxam gave significantly good control (2.11 in 2012 and 2.69 in 2013/6 plants) followed by imidacloprid and acetamiprid during both the seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid plots had the maximum yield in 2012.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
imidaclopride0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.33q/hae0
Comparator
trizophose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum yield in 2012 was found in imidacloprid treated plot (11.33q/ha) followed by thiamethaxam (10.88q/ha) and acetamiprid (10.77q/ha) in comparison to trizophos (9.55q/ha) and monocrotophos (8.55q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethaxam plots yielded 10.88q/ha in 2012.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
thiamethaxame0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
10.88q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum yield in 2012 was found in imidacloprid treated plot (11.33q/ha) followed by thiamethaxam (10.88q/ha) and acetamiprid (10.77q/ha) in comparison to trizophos (9.55q/ha) and monocrotophos (8.55q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid plots yielded 10.77q/ha in 2012.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
acetamipride0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
10.77q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly maximum yield in 2012 was found in imidacloprid treated plot (11.33q/ha) followed by thiamethaxam (10.88q/ha) and acetamiprid (10.77q/ha) in comparison to trizophos (9.55q/ha) and monocrotophos (8.55q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control yielded 5.22q/ha.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
5.22q/hae0
Setting
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 5.22q/ha yield was found in control plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamehaxam gave the best yield result in 2013.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
thiamehaxame0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
11.93q/hae0
Comparator
other tested insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the year 2013, thiamehaxam gave better results in increasing the yield (11.93q/ha) than other tested insecticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“urdbean (Vigna mungo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–93 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · Aleyrodoidea · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · Thrips · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.