Paper · 2023 · Horticulture Advances

Optimization of the regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in pear

Cheng Xue; Suli Guo; Kaidi Gu; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Conventional breeding in pears is inefficient due to a long juvenile phase and self-incompatibility. Genetic transformation offers a promise to expedite the breeding process. However, the frequencies of regeneration and genetic transformation in most Pyrus spp. are relatively low. This study investigated various factors influencing regeneration and genetic transformation using leaves from Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim “Shanli” and P. communis L. “Conference” as explants. The optimum regeneration medium for “Shanli” and “Conference” was NN69 containing 3.0 mg L −1 thidiazuron (TDZ) and 0.3 mg L −1 indolybutyric acid (IBA) for the former or 1.0 mg L −1 TDZ and 0.5 mg L −1 naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) for the latter. Sectioning the leaves from 30-day-old plantlets transversely and placing them with their abaxial side facing downward could significantly improve the regeneration ratio in both accessions. Moreover, a two- or four-week culture under the dark was beneficial for the regeneration of “Shanli” and “Conference” respectively. The optimal infection time was 12 and 8 min, while the time of the delayed screening test was two and one day for “Shanli” and “Conference” respectively. Moreover, a coculture of two days was recommended for both accessions. Post-transformation, the optimal concentrations of antibiotics were 16 mg L −1 kanamycin (Kan), 150 mg L −1 timentin (Tim), and 300 mg L −1 cefotaxime (Cef). The optimized regeneration and transformation system can be an effective alternative for either gene function analysis or genetic improvement in pear.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum regeneration medium for Shanli was NN69 with 3.0 mg/L TDZ and 0.3 mg/L IBA.

Taxon
Pyrus ussuriensis MaximPyrus ussuriensise0
Material
Shanlie1
Treatment
NN69 containing 3.0 mg L −1 thidiazuron (TDZ) and 0.3 mg L −1 indolybutyric acid (IBA)e1
Outcome
optimum regeneration mediume1
Value
3.0 mg L −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus ussuriensis
Pyrus ussuriensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The optimum regeneration medium for “Shanli” and “Conference” was NN69 containing 3.0 mg L −1 thidiazuron (TDZ) and 0.3 mg L −1 indolybutyric acid (IBA) for the former or 1.0 mg L −1 TDZ and 0.5 mg L −1 naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) for the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–726 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim “Shanli” and P. communis L. “Conference””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–465 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum regeneration medium for Conference was NN69-based with 1.0 mg/L TDZ and 0.5 mg/L NAA.

Taxon
P. communis L.Pyrus communise0
Material
Conferencee1
Treatment
1.0 mg L −1 TDZ and 0.5 mg L −1 naphthalene acetic acid (NAA)e1
Outcome
optimum regeneration mediume1
Value
1.0 mg L −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The optimum regeneration medium for “Shanli” and “Conference” was NN69 containing 3.0 mg L −1 thidiazuron (TDZ) and 0.3 mg L −1 indolybutyric acid (IBA) for the former or 1.0 mg L −1 TDZ and 0.5 mg L −1 naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) for the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–726 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim “Shanli” and P. communis L. “Conference””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sectioning leaves from 30-day-old plantlets with the abaxial side facing down could significantly improve regeneration ratio in both accessions.

Treatment
Sectioning the leaves from 30-day-old plantlets transversely and placing them with their abaxial side facing downwarde2
Outcome
regeneration ratioe2
Direction
improvee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sectioning the leaves from 30-day-old plantlets transversely and placing them with their abaxial side facing downward could significantly improve the regeneration ratio in both accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“transformation in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A two-week dark culture was beneficial for regeneration of Shanli leaves.

Taxon
Pyrus ussuriensis MaximPyrus ussuriensise0
Material
Shanlie3
Treatment
a two- or four-week culture under the darke3
Outcome
regeneratione3
Direction
beneficiale3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus ussuriensis
Pyrus ussuriensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“a two- or four-week culture under the dark was beneficial for the regeneration of “Shanli” and “Conference” respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1047 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim “Shanli” and P. communis L. “Conference””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A four-week dark culture was beneficial for regeneration of Conference leaves.

Taxon
P. communis L.Pyrus communise0
Material
Conferencee3
Treatment
a two- or four-week culture under the darke3
Outcome
regeneratione3
Direction
beneficiale3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“a two- or four-week culture under the dark was beneficial for the regeneration of “Shanli” and “Conference” respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1047 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim “Shanli” and P. communis L. “Conference””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–465 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal infection time was 12 min for Shanli and 8 min for Conference.

Outcome
optimal infection timee4
Value
12 and 8 mine4
Qualifier
respectivelye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The optimal infection time was 12 and 8 min, while the time of the delayed screening test was two and one day for “Shanli” and “Conference” respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“transformation in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The delayed screening test was two days for Shanli and one day for Conference.

Outcome
time of the delayed screening teste4
Value
two and one daye4
Qualifier
respectivelye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The optimal infection time was 12 and 8 min, while the time of the delayed screening test was two and one day for “Shanli” and “Conference” respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“transformation in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend a two-day coculture for both pear accessions.

Outcome
a coculture of two dayse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“a coculture of two days was recommended for both accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“transformation in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal post-transformation kanamycin concentration was 16 mg/L.

Compound
kanamycin (Kan)e6
Outcome
optimal concentrations of antibioticse6
Value
16 mg L −1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Post-transformation, the optimal concentrations of antibiotics were 16 mg L −1 kanamycin (Kan), 150 mg L −1 timentin (Tim), and 300 mg L −1 cefotaxime (Cef)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“transformation in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal post-transformation timentin concentration was 150 mg/L.

Compound
timentin (Tim)e6
Outcome
optimal concentrations of antibioticse6
Value
150 mg L −1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Post-transformation, the optimal concentrations of antibiotics were 16 mg L −1 kanamycin (Kan), 150 mg L −1 timentin (Tim), and 300 mg L −1 cefotaxime (Cef)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“transformation in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal post-transformation cefotaxime concentration was 300 mg/L.

Compound
cefotaxime (Cef)e6
Outcome
optimal concentrations of antibioticse6
Value
300 mg L −1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Post-transformation, the optimal concentrations of antibiotics were 16 mg L −1 kanamycin (Kan), 150 mg L −1 timentin (Tim), and 300 mg L −1 cefotaxime (Cef)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“transformation in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimized regeneration and transformation system can be an effective alternative for gene function analysis or genetic improvement in pear.

Outcome
effective alternative for either gene function analysis or genetic improvemente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The optimized regeneration and transformation system can be an effective alternative for either gene function analysis or genetic improvement in pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1581 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · growth · Pyrus ussuriensis (Ussurian pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.