Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Lowland Rice Growth and Yield (Oryza sativa L.) under Different Farming Practices

Kammala Waththe Asanka Madhushan; Samantha C. Karunarathna; Dissanayake Mudiyanselage Dharmasiri Dissanayake; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, a field experiment was conducted to evaluate the growth and yield responses of Sri Lankan lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) with the application of beneficial Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculum and intercropping with highly mycorrhizal-dependent vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) under two different soil nutrient management systems (NMSs): conventional/chemical (CNMS) and organic (ONMS). The experiment was designed as a split plot with three blocks. Each CNMS and ONMS experiment included an untreated control (T0) and three treatments—AMF inoculation (T1), vetiver intercropping (T2), and the combination of AMF and vetiver (T3). According to the results, the colonization of rice roots with AMF was not affected significantly by the treatments and ranged from 0–15.8%. The effect was very low or absent in the early stage and then higher in the later stages of the rice plant. Furthermore, plant growth was not significantly different between the two NMSs, although grain yield was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in ONMS than for the respective controls (T0), with the order T1 (0.45 kg/m2) > T2 (0.42 kg/m2) > T3 (0.41 kg/m2) in CNMS and T2 (0.44 kg/m2) > T1 (0.41 kg/m2) > T3 (0.40 kg/m2), thus suggesting the utilization of AMF and vetiver in a lowland rice farming system is beneficial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice root AMF colonization did not differ significantly among treatments and ranged from 0–15.8%.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
colonization of rice roots with AMFe0
Direction
not affectede0
Value
0–15.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the colonization of rice roots with AMF was not affected significantly by the treatments and ranged from 0–15.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AMF effect was low or absent early and higher in later rice stages.

Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungit0symbiont
Outcome
effect was very low or absent in the early stage and then higher in the later stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect was very low or absent in the early stage and then higher in the later stages of the rice plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Lowland Rice Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth did not differ significantly between nutrient management systems.

Treatment
NMSse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
two NMSse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth was not significantly different between the two NMSs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In CNMS, AMF inoculation yielded 0.45 kg/m2 grain and exceeded the untreated control.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.45 kg/m2e0
Comparator
T0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in ONMS than for the respective controls (T0), with the order T1 (0.45 kg/m2) > T2 (0.42 kg/m2) > T3 (0.41 kg/m2) in CNMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In CNMS, vetiver intercropping yielded 0.42 kg/m2 grain.

Treatment
vetiver intercroppinge1
Interactor
vetiverChrysopogon zizanioidese1other
Outcome
T2e0
Value
0.42 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysopogon zizanioides
Chrysopogon zizanioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 (0.45 kg/m2) > T2 (0.42 kg/m2) > T3 (0.41 kg/m2) in CNMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“vetiver intercropping (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In CNMS, combined AMF and vetiver yielded 0.41 kg/m2 grain.

Treatment
combination of AMF and vetivere1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Second interactor
vetiverChrysopogon zizanioidese1other
Outcome
T3e0
Value
0.41 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysopogon zizanioides
Chrysopogon zizanioides · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 (0.45 kg/m2) > T2 (0.42 kg/m2) > T3 (0.41 kg/m2) in CNMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of AMF and vetiver (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In ONMS, vetiver intercropping yielded 0.44 kg/m2 grain.

Treatment
vetiver intercroppinge1
Interactor
vetiverChrysopogon zizanioidese1other
Outcome
T2e0
Value
0.44 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysopogon zizanioides
Chrysopogon zizanioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 (0.44 kg/m2) > T1 (0.41 kg/m2) > T3 (0.40 kg/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“vetiver intercropping (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In ONMS, AMF inoculation yielded 0.41 kg/m2 grain.

Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
T1e0
Value
0.41 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 (0.44 kg/m2) > T1 (0.41 kg/m2) > T3 (0.40 kg/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“AMF inoculation (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In ONMS, combined AMF and vetiver yielded 0.40 kg/m2 grain.

Treatment
combination of AMF and vetivere1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Second interactor
vetiverChrysopogon zizanioidese1other
Outcome
T3e0
Value
0.40 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysopogon zizanioides
Chrysopogon zizanioides · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 (0.44 kg/m2) > T1 (0.41 kg/m2) > T3 (0.40 kg/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination of AMF and vetiver (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lowland Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using AMF and vetiver in lowland rice farming.

Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
vetiverChrysopogon zizanioidese0other
Outcome
utilization of AMF and vetiver in a lowland rice farming system is beneficiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysopogon zizanioides
Chrysopogon zizanioides · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“utilization of AMF and vetiver in a lowland rice farming system is beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1325 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 670 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.