Paper · 2023 · Sarhad Journal of Agriculture

Application of Amino Acids on Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.) cv. ‘Rataul No. 12: Assessment of Fruit Fly Infestation and Postharvest Parameters

Muhammad Hasnain; Ghulam Mustafa; Asif-ur- Rehman; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mango cv. 'Rataul No. 12' is one of Pakistan's finest mango cultivars. It produces small to mediumsized fruits that are flavorful, fragrant, and well-suited for preserving. Assessment of the pre-harvest amino acids application on the postharvest life of mangoes cv. 'Rataul No. 12' was done. The effect of amino acids on mango cultivar 'Rataul No. 12' with the objective of studying and improving fruit retention, yield, or qualitative and quantitative changes in physio-chemical characteristics during ripening. The impact of spraying amino acids on fruit retention at various fruiting stages i.e., pea, marble, egg, at matures stages as well as yield at the end of harvesting as compared to the control. Increasing amino acid percentages (Promise 6.55%, Flagon 10.00%, and Izabion 62.55%) also increased the number of fruits at the fully mature stage i.e., 1.43%, 1.82%, and 2.20%, respectively. As compared to control, there were statistically significant differences. The increased the percentage of amino acids also increased the yield, Izabi on was 105.9kg/plant, whereas Promise and Flagon showed 96.65kg/plant and 95.86%, but both were non-significantly different. Fruit ripening caused changes in those factors, which were noted. Spraying amino acids had no appreciable impact on the physical features of fruit during storage, such as weight loss, fruit colour, hardness, length, and lenticel burn. Fruit fly punctures were nonsignificant among the different chemicals as compared to the control. The maximum number was in control, i.e., 3.060.48 and the minimum was in Promise, followed by Flagon and Izabion, i.e., 0.450.21, 0.720.15 and 0.440.02, respectively. Whereas biochemical parameters, total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, vitamin C, rag weight, juice and stone weight were also non-significantly affected by amino acid spraying. The amino acids are essential for increasing the fruit retention and output of the fruit tree. Because amino acids are essential for the majority of biological processes, enhanced quantity and export quality should be utilized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid sprays increased the number of fully mature fruits compared with the control, by 1.43 to 2.20%.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Material
Rataul No. 12e2
Organ / stage
fully mature stagee0
Treatment
Promise 6.55%, Flagon 10.00%, and Izabion 62.55%e0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.43%, 1.82%, and 2.20%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing amino acid percentages (Promise 6.55%, Flagon 10.00%, and Izabion 62.55%) also increased the number of fruits at the fully mature stage i.e., 1.43%, 1.82%, and 2.20%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“As compared to control, there were statistically significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–970 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mango cv. 'Rataul No. 12' is one of Pakistan's finest mango cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing amino acid percentage increased yield in mango; Izabion gave 105.9 kg per plant.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
increased the percentage of amino acidse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
105.9kg/plante3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The increased the percentage of amino acids also increased the yield, Izabi on was 105.9kg/plant, whereas Promise and Flagon showed 96.65kg/plant and 95.86%, but both were non-significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Promise and Flagon yields of 96.65 kg and 95.86% per plant were not significantly different from the other amino acid yield.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
Promise and Flagone3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
non-significantly differente3
Value
96.65kg/plant and 95.86%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The increased the percentage of amino acids also increased the yield, Izabi on was 105.9kg/plant, whereas Promise and Flagon showed 96.65kg/plant and 95.86%, but both were non-significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid spraying had no appreciable effect on mango fruit physical features during storage.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
Spraying amino acidse4
Outcome
physical features of fruite4
Direction
no appreciable impacte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Spraying amino acids had no appreciable impact on the physical features of fruit during storage, such as weight loss, fruit colour, hardness, length, and lenticel burn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid sprays had no significant effect on fruit fly punctures compared with the control.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
different chemicalse5
Interactor
Fruit Flyt1pest
Outcome
Fruit fly puncturese5
Direction
nonsignificante5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Fruit fly punctures were nonsignificant among the different chemicals as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1504 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fruit Fly Infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Promise gave the fewest fruit fly punctures, 0.45 with SD 0.21, lower than the control.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
Promisee6
Interactor
Fruit Flyt1pest
Outcome
numbere6
Direction
minimume6
Value
0.450.21e6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The maximum number was in control, i.e., 3.060.48 and the minimum was in Promise, followed by Flagon and Izabion, i.e., 0.450.21, 0.720.15 and 0.440.02, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1671 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fruit Fly Infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid spraying had no significant effect on total soluble solids, pH and titratable acidity.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
amino acid sprayinge7
Outcome
total soluble solids, pH, titratable aciditye7
Direction
non-significantly affectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Whereas biochemical parameters, total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, vitamin C, rag weight, juice and stone weight were also non-significantly affected by amino acid spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid spraying had no significant effect on vitamin C, rag weight, juice and stone weight.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
amino acid sprayinge7
Outcome
vitamin C, rag weight, juice and stone weighte7
Direction
non-significantly affectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Whereas biochemical parameters, total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity, vitamin C, rag weight, juice and stone weight were also non-significantly affected by amino acid spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend that amino acids be used to enhance mango quantity and export quality.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicat0
Outcome
enhanced quantity and export qualitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“enhanced quantity and export quality should be utilized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Tree (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–62 · show in text ↑

amino acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.