Abstract
In the two seasons of 2023–2024, an experiment was conducted in Balat district of Afaq Farm, located in New Valley Governorate, Egypt to look at how gibberellin and naphthalene acetic acid affect in Mango Naomi cv. in fruit quality and yield. Three replications and seven treatments NAA (20, 40 and 80 ppm) and GA3 (25, 50 and 100 ppm) compared with control (water spray) were used in a complete randomized block design (RCBD) experiment. Together with total soluble solids, sugar content, and vitamin C, these treatments markedly increased fruit set, fruit retention, and yield compared with control. According to the current findings, spraying NAA at 40 or 80 ppm greatly increased fruit set, fruit retention, and yield compared to spraying water (control); on the other hand, spraying GA3 at 50 or 100 ppm was found to be more effective on fruit retention and fruit quality. However, the fruit quality improved more successfully when GA3 was sprayed at 50 or 100 ppm. There were no appreciable changes as a result of raising the GA3 or NAA concentrations from 50 to 100 ppm or 40 to 80 ppm. Therefore, using 40 ppm NAA or 50 ppm GA3 for spraying is better from an economic perspective. The productivity and quality of Naomi mango trees can be effectively increased by spraying GA3 and NAA.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
NAA sprays at 40 or 80 ppm greatly increased fruit set, fruit retention and yield of mango compared with water spray.
- Taxon
- Mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae6 - Material
- Naomie6
- Treatment
- spraying NAA at 40 or 80 ppme3
- Outcome
- fruit set, fruit retention, and yielde3
- Direction
- greatly increasede3
- Comparator
- spraying water (control)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“spraying NAA at 40 or 80 ppm greatly increased fruit set, fruit retention, and yield compared to spraying water (control)”
e6“affect in Mango Naomi cv. in fruit quality and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 sprays at 50 or 100 ppm were more effective than the other treatments for fruit retention and fruit quality of mango.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicae6
- Material
- Naomie6
- Treatment
- spraying GA3 at 50 or 100 ppme4
- Outcome
- fruit retention and fruit qualitye4
- Direction
- more effectivee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“spraying GA3 at 50 or 100 ppm was found to be more effective on fruit retention and fruit quality”
e6“affect in Mango Naomi cv. in fruit quality and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
NAA and GA3 treatments markedly increased total soluble solids, sugar content and vitamin C of mango compared with control.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicae6
- Material
- Naomie6
- Treatment
- NAA (20, 40 and 80 ppm) and GA3 (25, 50 and 100 ppm)e1
- Outcome
- total soluble solids, sugar content, and vitamin Ce2
- Direction
- markedly increasede2
- Comparator
- control (water spray)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“seven treatments NAA (20, 40 and 80 ppm) and GA3 (25, 50 and 100 ppm) compared with control (water spray)”
e2“Together with total soluble solids, sugar content, and vitamin C, these treatments markedly increased fruit set, fruit retention, and yield compared with control”
e6“affect in Mango Naomi cv. in fruit quality and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising GA3 or NAA concentrations from 50 to 100 ppm or 40 to 80 ppm caused no appreciable changes in mango.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicae6
- Material
- Naomie6
- Treatment
- raising the GA3 or NAA concentrations from 50 to 100 ppm or 40 to 80 ppme5
- Direction
- no appreciable changese5
Not reportedComparatorOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“There were no appreciable changes as a result of raising the GA3 or NAA concentrations from 50 to 100 ppm or 40 to 80 ppm”
e6“affect in Mango Naomi cv. in fruit quality and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying 40 ppm NAA or 50 ppm GA3 is better from an economic perspective for mango.
- Taxon
- MangoMangifera indicae6
- Material
- Naomie6
- Treatment
- using 40 ppm NAA or 50 ppm GA3 for sprayinge7
- Outcome
- better from an economic perspectivee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“using 40 ppm NAA or 50 ppm GA3 for spraying is better from an economic perspective”
e6“affect in Mango Naomi cv. in fruit quality and yield”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
25 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →application · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
81 papers more in this group
See all 85 papers →application · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.