Paper · 2023 · Sustainability

In Vitro Propagation of Several Valuable Selections of Robinia pseudoacacia L. as a Fast and Sustainable Source for Wood Production

Ruben Budău; Mariana Bei; Cristian Onet; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There is an increasing trend in forest production towards planting rapid-growing trees as attractive, environmentally friendly energy sources. This study aimed to establish an alternative to the traditional propagation of a number of selections of Robinia pseudoacacia L. by developing an in vitro culture protocol. This study’s topic is of great importance, and it reflects an ongoing concern at the University of Oradea’s Faculty of Environmental Protection’s sustainable research program. The explants from four forms (called S1, S2, S3, and S4), selected for their phenotypic characteristics, were inoculated on four culture media (Murashige–Skoog (MS), Anderson, Chée–Pool, and Driver and Kuniyuki Woody (DKW)) with the same phytohormonal balance. DKW medium proved to be the better support of morphogenic activity, and it was further tested under different phytohormonal balances. Different results were observed depending on the hormone content in the DKW environment. In the presence of 0.5 mg/L benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.04 mg/L aminoisobutyric acid (AIB), 91.5% of the explants developed an average of 4.45 ± 0.18 shoots, whereas the average upper shoot height (3.82 cm) was recorded on DKW medium with 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.04 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). Auxin, 0.05 mg/L AIB, promoted root production (5.27 ± 0.15 roots/explant), while 0.1 mg/L NAA promoted root length. In conclusion, the S4 selection produced the greatest outcomes of all environmental variables in terms of both the number of shoots and their heights.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW medium best supported morphogenic activity.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacacia L.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Treatment
DKW mediume0
Outcome
morphogenic activitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DKW medium proved to be the better support of morphogenic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacacia L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW with BAP and AIB produced shoots on 91.5% of explants.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacacia L.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Treatment
0.5 mg/L benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.04 mg/L aminoisobutyric acid (AIB)e0
Outcome
explants developede0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
91.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the presence of 0.5 mg/L benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.04 mg/L aminoisobutyric acid (AIB), 91.5% of the explants developed an average of 4.45 ± 0.18 shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacacia L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That BAP and AIB combination yielded 4.45 ± 0.18 shoots on average.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacacia L.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Treatment
0.5 mg/L benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.04 mg/L aminoisobutyric acid (AIB)e0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
4.45 ± 0.18 shootse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the presence of 0.5 mg/L benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.04 mg/L aminoisobutyric acid (AIB), 91.5% of the explants developed an average of 4.45 ± 0.18 shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacacia L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DKW with BAP and NAA produced an upper shoot height of 3.82 cm.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacacia L.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Treatment
DKW medium with 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.04 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)e0
Outcome
average upper shoot heighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
3.82 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average upper shoot height (3.82 cm) was recorded on DKW medium with 0.5 mg/L BAP and 0.04 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacacia L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AIB at 0.05 mg/L promoted 5.27 ± 0.15 roots per explant.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacacia L.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Treatment
0.05 mg/L AIBe0
Outcome
root productione0
Direction
promotede0
Value
5.27 ± 0.15 roots/explante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.05 mg/L AIB, promoted root production (5.27 ± 0.15 roots/explant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacacia L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 0.1 mg/L promoted root length.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacacia L.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Treatment
0.1 mg/L NAAe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.1 mg/L NAA promoted root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacacia L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection S4 had the greatest shoot number and height responses.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacacia L.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Material
S4 selectione0
Outcome
number of shoots and their heightse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the S4 selection produced the greatest outcomes of all environmental variables in terms of both the number of shoots and their heights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacacia L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

in vitro · growth · Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.