Paper · 2023 · Jurnal Fitopatologi Indonesia/Jurnal Fitopatologi

The Diversity of Shallot Rhizomicrobiome and Twisted Disease Suppression with The Applicationof Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma asperellum

Dini Sundari; Arif Wibowo; Tri Joko; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Twisted disease (Fusarium spp.) is an endemic disease that reduces shallot production in the coastal land area of Samas, Bantul, Yogyakarta. The application of Bacillus spp. can suppress the twisted disease by secreting secondary metabolites and enhancing soil suppressiveness. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of adding spraying Bacillus spp. on the disease incidence, production of shallots, and their effect on the diversity of rhizomicrobiome by culture microbe approaches. Bacillus spp. with a density 108 cfu mL-1, Trichoderma asperellum 106 cfu mL-1 was applied by spraying to the shallot. Fungicide chlorothalonil, propiconazole, and prochloraz were used to control the disease. The diversity of rhizobacteria and fungi was analyzed using the ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) method. Based on the analysis result, the addition of spraying B. velezensis B-27, combination B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76, and T. asperellum was unable to enhance the suppression of twisted disease, but it was able to enhance the production of shallot bulbs reaching 7.10, 7.80, and 8.43 ton ha-1. Furthermore, the result revealed the diversity of the rhizomicrobiome, spraying Bacillus sp. showed 39% differences in bacterial diversity with control while T. asperellum caused 43% difference in the diversity. Spraying Bacillus spp. has not been able to suppress the incidence of twisted diseases compared to control. However, the similar disease incidence on a spraying Bacillus spp. and control showed a higher production until 70% compared to control. This result showed that the addition of spraying Bacillus spp. able to increase the tolerance of shallot plants toward twisted disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional spraying of B. velezensis B-27, the combination of B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76, and T. asperellum did not enhance suppression of shallot twisted disease.

Treatment
spraying B. velezensis B-27, combination B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76, and T. asperellume0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume1pathogen
Second interactor
B. velezensis B-27Bacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
suppression of twisted diseasee0
Direction
unable to enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of spraying B. velezensis B-27, combination B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76, and T. asperellum was unable to enhance the suppression of twisted disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twisted disease (Fusarium spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying B. velezensis B-27 enhanced shallot bulb production, reaching 7.10 ton ha-1.

Treatment
B. velezensis B-27e2
Interactor
B. velezensis B-27Bacillus velezensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
production of shallot bulbse2
Direction
enhancee2
Value
7.10e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the addition of spraying B. velezensis B-27, combination B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76, and T. asperellum was unable to enhance the suppression of twisted disease, but it was able to enhance the production of shallot bulbs reaching 7.10, 7.80, and 8.43 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying the combination of B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76 enhanced shallot bulb production, reaching 7.80 ton ha-1.

Treatment
combination B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76e2
Interactor
B. velezensis B-27Bacillus velezensise2biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. cereus RC76Bacillus cereuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
production of shallot bulbse2
Direction
enhancee2
Value
7.80e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · Second interactorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the addition of spraying B. velezensis B-27, combination B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76, and T. asperellum was unable to enhance the suppression of twisted disease, but it was able to enhance the production of shallot bulbs reaching 7.10, 7.80, and 8.43 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying T. asperellum enhanced shallot bulb production, reaching 8.43 ton ha-1.

Treatment
T. asperellume2
Interactor
T. asperellumTrichoderma asperellume2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
production of shallot bulbse2
Direction
enhancee2
Value
8.43 ton ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the addition of spraying B. velezensis B-27, combination B. velezensis B-27 and B. cereus RC76, and T. asperellum was unable to enhance the suppression of twisted disease, but it was able to enhance the production of shallot bulbs reaching 7.10, 7.80, and 8.43 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying Bacillus sp. produced a 39% difference in bacterial diversity of the shallot rhizomicrobiome compared with the control.

Treatment
spraying Bacillus sp.e3
Interactor
Bacillus sp.e3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bacterial diversitye3
Direction
differencese3
Value
39%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“spraying Bacillus sp. showed 39% differences in bacterial diversity with control while T. asperellum caused 43% difference in the diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot Rhizomicrobiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying T. asperellum produced a 43% difference in rhizomicrobiome diversity of shallot compared with the control.

Treatment
T. asperellume3
Interactor
T. asperellumTrichoderma asperellume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diversitye3
Direction
differencee3
Value
43%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“spraying Bacillus sp. showed 39% differences in bacterial diversity with control while T. asperellum caused 43% difference in the diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot Rhizomicrobiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying Bacillus spp. did not suppress the incidence of twisted disease compared with the control.

Treatment
Spraying Bacillus spp.e4
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of twisted diseasese4
Direction
not been able to suppresse4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Spraying Bacillus spp. has not been able to suppress the incidence of twisted diseases compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With disease incidence similar to the control, spraying Bacillus spp. gave production up to 70% higher than the control.

Treatment
spraying Bacillus spp.e5
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
productione5
Direction
highere5
Value
70%e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the similar disease incidence on a spraying Bacillus spp. and control showed a higher production until 70% compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that spraying Bacillus spp. increased the tolerance of shallot plants toward twisted disease.

Treatment
spraying Bacillus spp.e6
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tolerance of shallot plants toward twisted diseasee6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the addition of spraying Bacillus spp. able to increase the tolerance of shallot plants toward twisted disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1710 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma asperellum · Fusarium · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus velezensis · Fusarium · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus velezensis · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma asperellum · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Fusarium · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Foliar boron increased visible toxicity symptoms in onions.

    The Contribution of Foliar Exposure to Boron Toxicity · 2007 · compared with without a component of foliar contact

    Opposite direction

  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
    Foliar boron decreased yields in onions.

    The Contribution of Foliar Exposure to Boron Toxicity · 2007 · compared with without a component of foliar contact

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.