Paper · 2024 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Application of Silica Nanoparticles in Combination with Bacillus velezensis and Bacillus thuringiensis for Anthracnose Disease Control in Shallot

Jilan Tsani Abdullah; Suryanti .; Tri Joko

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background and Objective: Anthracnose in shallot contributes to significant losses. To solve this issue, silica nanoparticles, in combination with Bacillus velezensis and Bacillus thuringiensis were used together. Materials and Methods: In vitro antagonistic test of Bacillus velezensis B-27 with Colletotrichum gloeosporioides was carried out using dual culture and co-culture methods. Treatment in greenhouse experiments was carried out using single application of silica, B. thuringiensis, B. velezensis, a combination of B. thuringiensis and B. velezensis and a combination of B. thuringiensis, B. velezensis and silica. Detection of B. velezensis in the roots of shallot plants was carried out by PCR using a pair of specific primers. Results: Bacillus velezensis was able to inhibit the growth of C. gloeosporioides mycelium in vitro, both in the dual culture and co-culture methods, by 62.8 and 77.17%, respectively. Treatment of B. thuringiensis and B. velezensis, either individually or in combination with silica, could reduce the intensity of anthracnose disease by 20% each and stimulate the growth of shallot plants. The PCR detection using specific primers on the roots of shallot plants showed that B. velezensis was detected with a DNA band length of ±576 bp. Conclusion: Bacillus velezensis can inhibit the growth of C. gloeosporioides mycelium in vitro. Applying B. velezensis, B. thuringiensis and silica can reduce the intensity of anthracnose disease, promote plant growth and increase plant productivity. Furthermore, B. velezensis was detected in the roots of shallot plants, revealing that the bacteria are well-established.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. velezensis inhibited C. gloeosporioides mycelium by 62.8% in dual culture.

Treatment
Bacillus velezensise0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus velezensisBacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of C. gloeosporioides myceliume0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
62.8e0
Qualifier
dual culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus velezensis was able to inhibit the growth of C. gloeosporioides mycelium in vitro, both in the dual culture and co-culture methods, by 62.8 and 77.17%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. velezensis inhibited C. gloeosporioides mycelium by 77.17% in co-culture.

Treatment
Bacillus velezensise0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus velezensisBacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of C. gloeosporioides myceliume0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
77.17%e0
Qualifier
co-culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus velezensis was able to inhibit the growth of C. gloeosporioides mycelium in vitro, both in the dual culture and co-culture methods, by 62.8 and 77.17%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis and B. velezensis treatments reduced anthracnose intensity by 20% each.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis and B. velezensise0
Interactor
B. thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. velezensisBacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
intensity of anthracnose diseasee0
Direction
reducee0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · Second interactorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of B. thuringiensis and B. velezensis, either individually or in combination with silica, could reduce the intensity of anthracnose disease by 20% each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bacillus treatments stimulated shallot growth.

Outcome
growth of shallot plantse0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulate the growth of shallot plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR detected B. velezensis in shallot roots with a band of approximately 576 bp.

Interactor
B. velezensisBacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
B. velezensis was detectede0
Value
±576 bpe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. velezensis was detected with a DNA band length of ±576 bp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that applying B. velezensis, B. thuringiensis and silica promotes shallot productivity.

Treatment
B. velezensis, B. thuringiensis and silicae0
Interactor
B. velezensisBacillus velezensise0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant productivitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying B. velezensis, B. thuringiensis and silica can reduce the intensity of anthracnose disease, promote plant growth and increase plant productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–145 · show in text ↑

Bacillus velezensis · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus velezensis · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon dioxide · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.